United States Department of Labor, Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs v. Patriot Steel, LLC (agency decision, September 24, 2019)

OFCCP v. Patriot Steel, LLC (DOL ARB 2019-0086): unopposed default judgment adopted

Decision type
agency decision
Dockets
ARB 2019-0086, ALJ 2019-OFC-00001
Decided
September 24, 2019
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable agency precedent
Checked against source
2026-09-06
Official source

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable agency precedent from 2019, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2019
The standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later agency or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ARB decision
This decision is a final action of the Administrative Review Board under 29 C.F.R. § 26.1(b), which provides that the Board acts as fully and finally as the Secretary of Labor for matters within its authority. The Board adopted the ALJ's recommended default judgment as its final administrative order and closed the case.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official agency release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release

Plain-English summary

The Department of Labor's Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs brought an Executive Order 11246 case against Patriot Steel. An ALJ issued a recommended decision and default judgment on July 25, 2019. No party filed exceptions, and the deadlines for exceptions or extensions expired. The Board adopted the ALJ's decision and factual findings as its final administrative order, directed the parties to comply with it, and closed the case. The released Board text does not state the specific terms of the underlying default judgment.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authority: 41 C.F.R. § 60-30.28
  • Outcome: Unopposed recommended default judgment adopted as the final administrative order; case closed.
  • Key point: When no party timely files exceptions, the Board may adopt the ALJ's recommended default judgment as its final order.

Full text (DOL official public release)

U.S. Department of Labor Administrative Review Board
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20210

  In the Matter of:


  UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT                              ARB CASE NO.         2019-0086
  OF LABOR, OFFICE OF FEDERAL
  CONTRACT COMPLIANCE                                   ALJ CASE NO.         2019-OFC-00001
  PROGRAMS,
                                                        DATE: September 24, 2019
                  PLAINTIFF,

         v.

  PATRIOT STEEL, LLC,

                  DEFENDANT.


                            FINAL ADMINISTRATIVE ORDER

         On September 25, 2019, the Administrative Review Board (Board) received
  the Administrative Law Judge’s (ALJ) Recommended Decision and Order of Default
  Judgment, dated July 25, 2019, along with the record in this matter. 1 No party has
  filed any exceptions with the Board, and the time has passed for the filing of
  exceptions or extensions of time to file exceptions to the ALJ’s decision. 2 As such,
  the Recommended Decision and Order of Default Judgment, dated July 25, 2019,
  and the findings of fact therein, are hereby ADOPTED as the Final Administrative
  Order in this matter and the parties are directed to comply therewith. A copy of the
  ALJ’s Order is attached. Accordingly, this case is hereby CLOSED.

                             ~ SIGNATURE ON NEXT PAGE ~


  1       The Administrative Law Judge’s decision arose under Executive Order 11246 (30 Fed. Reg.
  12319 (Sep. 24, 1965)), as amended. The Executive Order’s implementing regulations are found at 41
  C.F.R. Parts 60-1 through 60-50 (2018).
  2      41 C.F.R. § 60-30.28.

  FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD:



  William T. Barto
  Chief Administrative Appeals Judge

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace