Whiting-Turner/Walsh Joint Venture (Board decision, January 8, 2021)

Whiting-Turner/Walsh Joint Venture (DOL ARB 2018-0008): prevailing-wage appeals settled and dismissed

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
ARB 2018-0008, ARB 2018-0010, ARB 2018-0012, ARB 2018-0013, ALJ 2015-DBA-00014
Decided
January 8, 2021
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-09-05

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2021, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Final ARB decision
This decision is a final action of the Administrative Review Board under 29 C.F.R. § 26.1(b), which provides that the Board acts as fully and finally as the Secretary of Labor for matters within its authority. The Board dismissed the consolidated appeals under the parties' settlement agreement.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official DOL ARB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

Plain-English summary

The consolidated appeals concerned prevailing wages, fringe benefits, overtime pay, and proposed debarment arising from an asbestos-abatement project at the General Services Administration headquarters. Several contractors and the Wage and Hour Division Administrator had appealed an ALJ's October 2017 decision. The parties informed the Board that they had executed a settlement fully resolving all claims and stipulated to dismissal. The Board dismissed the matter in accordance with their agreement.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited authorities: 40 U.S.C. §§ 3141 et seq. and 3701 et seq.; 29 C.F.R. Part 5
  • Outcome: Four consolidated appeals dismissed under the parties' settlement.
  • Key point: A fully executed settlement and joint stipulation ended the prevailing-wage and debarment dispute.

Full text (DOL official public release)

U.S. Department of Labor Administrative Review Board 200 Constitution Ave. NW
Washington, DC 20210-0001

In the Matter of:

Disputes concerning the payment
ARB CASE NOS. 2018-0008
of prevailing wages rates, fringe
2018-0010
benefits, and overtime pay by: 2018-0012
2018-0013
WHITING-TURNER/WALSH
JOINT VENTURE, ALJ CASE NO. 2015-DBA-00014
Prime Contractor,
DATE: January 8, 2021
INTERIOR SPECIALISTS, INC.,
1st-Tier Subcontractor,

ASBESTOS SPECIALISTS, INC.,
2nd-Tier Subcontractor,
and

Proposed debarment for labor standard violations by:

ASBESTOS SPECIALISTS, INC.,
2nd-Tier Subcontractor,

SAMUEL CHAIRS, III,
President,

TIMOTHY J . CHAIRS,
Vice-President,

With respect to laborers and mechanics employed by WMS Solutions, LLC, a staffing company hired by 2nd Tier Subcontractor Asbestos Specialists, Inc. on Contract GS-llP-l0MKC-0025, the Asbestos Abatement Project at General Service Administration Headquarters Building, Washington, D.C.

BEFORE: THE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD 2

ORDER GRANTING DISMISSAL

This case arises under the Davis Bacon Act (DBA),1 the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act (CWHSSA),2 and the applicable implementing regulations.3 Respondents Whiting-Turner/Walsh Joint Venture, Interior Specialists, Inc., and Asbestos Specialists Inc. (collectively, Respondents) and the Administrator of the U.S. Department of Labor’s Wage and Hour Division (Administrator) (collectively, the Parties) appealed the October 19, 2017 Decision and Order (D. & O.) of a Department of Labor Administrative Law Judge (ALJ).

On January 5, 2021, the Parties informed the Administrative Review Board that they had “executed a Settlement Agreement (“Agreement”) that fully and finally resolved all claims in the above-captioned matter.” The Parties also agreed and stipulated to the dismissal of this matter.

Accordingly, we DISMISS this matter in accordance with the Parties’ agreement.

SO ORDERED.

FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD:

_____
JAMES D. MCGINLEY
CHIEF JUDGE/CHAIR
ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD

1
40 U.S.C. § 3141 et seq. (2013).
2
40 U.S.C. § 3701 et seq. (2018).
3
29 C.F.R. Part 5 (2020).

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace