PWCA and National Association of Prevailing Wage Contractors v. Secretary of Labor (agency decision, June 24, 2019)
PWCA and NAPWC v. Secretary of Labor (DOL ARB 2016-0019 and 2016-0021): supplemental-benefit rulings remanded
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable agency precedent from 2019, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
PWCA and the National Association of Prevailing Wage Contractors sponsored supplemental unemployment-benefit plans for employers subject to Davis-Bacon prevailing-wage requirements. They challenged 2015 Wage and Hour Division rulings requiring participating employers to annualize plan contributions. After the Board requested supplemental briefing, the Administrator asked for a remand to reconsider whether those rulings should remain in effect. The Board granted that request without deciding the annualization question. It denied a related extension request as moot and dismissed both appeals without prejudice.
Decision snapshot
- Cited authority: 40 U.S.C. §§ 3141-3148
- Outcome: Administrator's remand motion granted; extension motion denied as moot; appeals dismissed without prejudice.
- Key point: The Wage and Hour Division was allowed to reconsider its own annualization rulings before the Board resolved the merits.
Full text (DOL official public release)
U.S. Department of Labor Administrative Review Board
200 Constitution Avenue, N.W.
Washington, D.C. 20210
In the Matter of:
PWCA (formerly PREVAILING WAGE ARB CASE NOS. 2016-0019
CONTRACTORS’ ASSOCIATION, Inc.) 2016-0021
and DATE: June 24, 2019
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF
PREVAILING WAGE CONTRACTORS
(NAPWC),
PETITIONERS,
v.
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
RESPONDENT,
INDIANA-ILLINOIS-IOWA FOUNDATION FOR
FAIR CONTRACTING (III FFC),
INTERVENOR.
Appearances:
For the Petitioner PWCA (formerly Prevailing Wage Contractors
Association, Inc.):
Martha L. Hutzelman, Esq.; Law Office of Martha L. Hutzelman; New
Albany, Ohio; and Maurice Baskin, Esq.; Littler Mendelson, PC;
Washington, District of Columbia
For the Petitioner National Association of Prevailing Wage Contractors
(NAPWC):
Richard M. Freeman, Esq.; Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton
LLP; San Diego, California
For the Respondent Administrator, Wage and Hour Division:
Kate S. O’Scannlain, Esq.; Jennifer S. Brand, Esq.; Jonathan T.
Rees, Esq.; Quinn Philbin, Esq.; and Mary E. McDonald, Esq.;
United States Department of Labor; Washington, District of
Columbia
For Intervenor Indiana-Illinois-Iowa Foundation for Fair Contracting (III
FFC):
Keith R. Bolek, Esq.; Lance Geren, Esq.; and Jacob N. Szewczyk, Esq.;
O’Donoghue & O’Donoghue, LLP; Washington, District of Columbia;
and Melissa L. Binetti, Esq.; Marc R. Poulos, Esq.; and Kara M.
Principe, Esq.; Indiana- Illinois-Iowa Foundation for Fair
Contracting; Countryside, Illinois
For Amicus Curiae North America’s Building Trades Unions (NABTU):
Terry R. Yellig, Esq.; and Esmeralda Aguilar, Esq.; Sherman Dunn,
P.C.; Washington, District of Columbia
For Amicus Curiae United Steelworkers:
Benjamin Eisner, Esq.; and Yael Kalman, Esq.; Spear Wilderman,
P.C.; Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
ORDER GRANTING ADMINISTRATOR’S MOTION TO REMAND
This matter arises under the Davis-Bacon Act, as amended, 40 U.S.C.
§§ 3141-3148 (2006) (DBA or the Act) and its implementing regulations at 29 C.F.R.
Parts 1, 5, 6 and 7 (2018). Petitioners PWCA and the National Association of
Prevailing Wage Contractors sponsor plans that offer a supplemental
unemployment benefit (“SUB”) to participating employers. Petitioners challenge the
October 22, 2015, final rulings of the Administrator, Wage and Hour Division (the
Administrator) that participating employers in their SUB plans must annualize
contributions to the SUBs to satisfy the DBA’s prevailing wage requirements.
On March 14, 2019, the Board issued an Order for Supplemental Briefing,
inviting the Administrator to address two questions. The Administrator has
submitted the “Administrator’s Motion to Remand to the Wage and Hour Division
and Response to Supplemental Briefing Order” (May 23, 2019). The Administrator
requests that this case be remanded to the Administrator to determine whether the
October 22, 2015, rulings should remain in effect. Motion at 2, 5-9. Alternatively,
the Administrator requests a stay of the current proceedings pending her review of
the October 22, 2015, rulings. Motion at 9-10, 20-21. The Administrator further
provides “a brief response” to the questions the Board posed in its Order for
Supplemental Briefing. Motion at 10-20.
The Intervener, the Indiana-Illinois-Iowa Foundation for Fair Contracting
(III FFC), and the North America’s Building Trades Unions (NABTU), as amicus
curiae, filed a joint motion for an extension of time to respond to the Administrator’s
motion and the Board’s order. Petitioner PWCA filed an objection to their joint
request for an extension of time to respond to the Administrator’s motion.
Subsequently, without the Board acting on their joint motion for an extension of
time or granting them leave to do so, the Intervener, III FFC, and the NABTU, as
amicus curiae, have filed an untimely response to the Administrator’s motion and
the Board’s order.
Upon review of the Administrator’s motion to remand, we GRANT the
Administrator’s motion and REMAND this case to the Administrator to determine
whether the Administrator’s October 22, 2015, rulings should remain in effect. We
DENY the joint motion for an extension of time to respond to the Administrator’s
motion as it is rendered moot by this remand. Thus, we DISMISS the above-
captioned appeals without prejudice.
SO ORDERED.
FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW BOARD:
WILLIAM T. BARTO
Chief Administrative Appeals Judge
Note: Questions regarding any case pending before the Board should be directed to
the Board’s staff at (202) 693-6200 or by facsimile at (202) 693-6220.
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace