Mitchellace, Inc.
Withdrawal of contest affirmed
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1973, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Mitchellace moved to withdraw its notice of contest and tendered $175 as full payment of the proposed penalty. The company also agreed to comply with the Act and standards, submit a compliance plan, immediately implement a personal protective equipment plan, and post and serve the case documents. No party objected, and the judge found that granting the motion was consistent with the Act. The judge granted the withdrawal and dismissed the proceeding, and the Commission affirmed the order in full. The release does not identify the standards involved.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): Not identified in the release
- Outcome: The notice of contest was withdrawn, the $175 proposed penalty was paid, and the proceeding was dismissed.
- Key point: The uncontested withdrawal was accepted after the employer agreed to payment, compliance measures, posting, and service.
Full text (OSHRC public release)
Docket No. 982
MITCHELLACE, INC.
�
OSHRC Docket No. 982
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
May 23, 1973
�
Before MORAN, Chairman; VAN NAMEE, Commissioner
OPINIONBY: MORAN
OPINION:
�
MORAN, CHAIRMAN: On October 17, 1972, Review Commission Judge Ben D. Worcester issued an order in this case granting respondent's motion to withdraw notice of contest.
�
Thereafter, on November 13, 1972, pursuant to section 12(j) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.C. 651,
et seq.,
84 Stat. 1590) that decision was directed to be reviewed by the Commission.
Having examined the record in its entirety, the Commission finds no prejudicial error therein.
�
Accordingly, it is ordered that the Judge's decision is hereby affirmed in all respects.
[The Judge's decision referred to herein follows]
WORCESTER, JUDGE, OSAHRC: The Respondent on September 21, 1972, moved to withdraw its notice of contest filed June 7, 1972, and has:
1.
�
Tendered payment of $175.00 in full payment of the proposed penalty.
2.
�
Agreed to comply with the Act and the standards.
3.
�
Agreed to submit by November 1, 1972, a proposed compliance plan and to immediately implement a personnel protective equipment plan.
4.
�
Has posted copies of all documents pertaining to this proceeding at its workplace; and has
5.
�
Served copies of all documents upon counsel for the Complainant.
�
Neither the Complainant nor any other party in interest has entered any objection to the granting of the motion nor is there any evidence that the granting of said motion would be inconsistent with the purpose of the Act.
It is, therefore, hereby ORDERED that the motion be granted and the proceeding dismissed.
�
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 1973. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.