Gutknecht Construction Co. (Commission decision, July 18, 1997)

Settlement approved as final order

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
95-0956
Decided
July 18, 1997
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-07-23

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1997, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1997
The OSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official OSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official OSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (oshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

After the case was directed for Commission review, the parties filed a stipulation and settlement agreement. The Commission found that the agreement raised no issue warranting further review and was consistent with the Occupational Safety and Health Act and Commission rules. It incorporated the settlement into its order and set aside the ALJ decision to the extent it conflicted with the agreement.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): None identified in the Commission order.
  • Outcome: The settlement was incorporated into the final order, and the ALJ decision was set aside where inconsistent.
  • Key point: A settlement filed during Commission review can replace inconsistent portions of the ALJ decision and become the Commission's final order.

Full text (OSHRC public release)

United States of America
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION 1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor
Washington, DC 20036-3419

Office of
Phone: (202) 606-5100
Executive Secretary
Fax: (202) 606-5050

:
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
:
:
Complainant,
:
:
v. : OSHRC Docket No. 95-0956
:
GUTKNECHT CONSTRUCTION CO.,
:
:
Respondent.
:
:

ORDER

This matter is before the Commission on a direction for review entered by Commissioner

Daniel Guttman on August 9, 1996. The parties have now filed a stipulation and settlement

agreement.

Having reviewed the record, and based upon the representations appearing in the

stipulation and settlement agreement, we conclude that this case raises no matters warranting

further review by the Commission. The terms of the stipulation and settlement agreement do not

appear to be contrary to the purposes of the Occupational Safety and Health Act and are in

compliance with the Commission's Rules of Procedure.

Accordingly, we incorporate the terms of the stipulation and settlement agreement into

this order, and we set aside the Administrative Law Judge's decision and order to the extent that
2

it is inconsistent with the stipulation and settlement agreement. This is the final order of the

Commission in this case. See 29 U.S.C. §§ 659(c), 660(a), and (b).

/s/
Stuart E. Weisberg
Chairman

Date: July 18, 1997
/s/
Daniel Guttman
Commissioner

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace