Dayton Tire, Bridgestone/Firestone

Plain-English summary

The Commission had previously affirmed ninety-nine lockout/tagout violations as willful and assessed $1,975,000 in penalties against Dayton Tire. The D.C. Circuit vacated the willful classifications for insufficient evidence and remanded for the Commission to reassess the violations and penalties. On remand, the Commission found that the servicing and maintenance hazards could cause death or serious physical harm and reclassified all ninety-nine violations as serious. Applying the statutory penalty factors and accounting for Dayton's compliance efforts, the Commission reduced the total penalty to $197,500.

Decision snapshot

• Cited standard(s): 29 C.F.R. § 1910.147
• Outcome: Ninety-nine violations were affirmed as serious rather than willful, and the total penalty was reduced from $1,975,000 to $197,500.
• Key point: When an appellate court rejects willfulness, the Commission must reassess both the proper classification and the penalties under the statutory factors.

Full text (OSHRC public release)

800x600

Clean
Clean

false
false
false

EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE

MicrosoftInternetExplorer4

United States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

1120 20th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

Washington, DC 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF
LABOR,

Complainant,

v.

OSHRC
Docket No. 94-1374

DAYTON
TIRE, BRIDGESTONE/FIRESTONE ,

Respondent,

UNITED
STEEL WORKERS OF AMERICA , LOCAL 998,

Authorized
Employee

Representative.

DECISION
AND ORDER

Before: � ROGERS, Chairman; ATTWOOD, Commissioner.

BY THE COMMISSION:

����������� In
a September 10, 2010 Decision and Order, the Commission affirmed ninety-nine violations
of the general industry lockout/tagout (�LOTO�) standard, 29 C.F.R. � 1910.147,
alleged in a citation issued to Dayton Tire, Bridgestone/Firestone (�Dayton�)
under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (�OSH Act�), 29 U.S.C. ��
651-678. � Dayton Tire , 23 BNA OSHC
1247, 2010 CCH OSHD � 33,098 (No. 94-1374, 2010). � The Commission characterized all of the
affirmed violations as willful and assessed a total penalty of $1,975,000. � Dayton filed a petition for review with the
U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, challenging, inter alia , the Commission�s willful characterization of these
violations. � The D.C. Circuit vacated
this portion of the Commission�s order, holding that there was insufficient
evidence to support a finding that any of Dayton�s ninety-nine violations were
willful, and �remand[ ed ] for the Commission to
reassess the nature of Dayton�s violations and recalculate the appropriate
penalty.� � Dayton Tire v. Sec�y of Labor , 671 F.3d 1249, 1257 (D.C. Cir.
2012). ��

Under
the OSH Act, a violation is characterized as serious if �there is a substantial
probability that death or serious physical harm could result.� � 29 U.S.C. � 666(k). � Based on the record evidence described in our
previous decision, we find that a � substantial
probability� of �death or serious physical harm� could have resulted from the
servicing and maintenance activities performed by Dayton employees on the
machines and equipment at issue, and that compliance with the cited LOTO
provisions would have minimized or eliminated these hazards. � Dayton Tire , 23 BNA
OSHC at 1252, 2010 CCH OSHD at p. 54,816 . � We therefore affirm all ninety-nine LOTO
standard violations as serious. � See Burkes Mech., Inc. , 21 BNA OSHC
2136, 2141, 2004-09 CCH OSHD � 32,922, p. 53,564 (No. 04-1475, 2007) (affirming
LOTO violation as serious based on record evidence).

The
penalties for these serious violations are considered in light of the OSH Act�s
statutory factors ,
which require the Commission to give �due consideration to the
appropriateness of the penalty with respect to the size of the business of the
employer being charged, the gravity of the violation, the good faith of the
employer, and the history of previous violations.� � 29 U.S.C. � 666(j). � In our previous decision, we concluded that
no reductions were warranted for business size or good faith, but that a
reduction was warranted for history. � Dayton Tire , 23 BNA
OSHC at 1266-67, 2010 CCH OSHD at p. 54,829. �
We also concluded that the gravity of each violation was
high. � Id. at 1267 , 2010 CCH OSHD at p. 54,829. � On remand, our analysis of business size,
history, and gravity remain the same. �
With respect to good faith, however, we have taken into account the D.C.
Circuit�s findings regarding Dayton�s efforts to comply with the LOTO
standard�particularly that Dayton�s safety manager �made some effort to ensure Dayton�s LOTO compliance,� but she �may not
have displayed the kind of initiative [one] would expect when lives and limbs
are at stake.� � Dayton Tire, 671 F.3d at 1257. ��

Given
the foregoing analysis, we assess the following penalty amounts, totaling
$197,500, for the affirmed items: � Items
1 through 6 - $2,500 each; Item 7 - $1,500; Items 8a and 8b - $1,000 (grouped);
and Items 9 through 12, 14 through 17, 20 through 30, 32 through 48, 50 through
83, 86, 87, 89 through 98, 100 through 106, and 108 - $2,000 each. �����

SO
ORDERED.

/s/ ��������������������������������������������������������

Thomasina V. Rogers

Chairman

�����������������������������������������������������������

/s/ ��������������������������������������������������������

Cynthia L. Attwood

Dated: May 23, 2012 ������������������������������������������������� Commissioner