Good Times Mining, Inc. (ALJ decision, December 22, 1992)

Good Times Mining, Inc. (FMSHRC 91-1, VA 91-462, KENT 91-1051): Civil penalty proceedings dismissed

Decision type
ALJ decision
Dockets
91-1, VA 91-462, KENT 91-1051
Decided
December 22, 1992
Presiding judge
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Final order, not precedent
Checked against source
2026-08-15

Apply this to your situation

This order from 1992 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1992
The MSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Final ALJ decision, not Commission precedent
This order became final under the 40-day rule in 30 U.S.C. § 823(d)(1) because no later Commission review appears in the official index. It binds the parties but is not Commission precedent. The full text below is from the official FMSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FMSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Transcribed from a scanned original: FMSHRC released this decision as an image-only file. The full text below is a machine transcription, proofread against the scan. Check the official release before quoting exact language.
Read the official release (fmshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Good Times Mining and its principal entered criminal plea agreements concerning falsified dust samples submitted to MSHA. The Secretary agreed to seek dismissal of the related civil penalty proceedings. Judge James A. Broderick found that dismissal under these circumstances served the purposes of the Mine Act and dismissed all three proceedings.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): The order does not identify a specific Mine Act or regulatory provision.
  • Outcome: The civil penalty proceedings under Master Docket No. 91-1, Docket No. VA 91-462, and Docket No. KENT 91-1051 were dismissed.
  • Key point: The Judge dismissed the civil proceedings after the operator and its principal entered plea agreements concerning the falsification of dust samples.

Full text (FMSHRC public release)

~2081

SECRETARY OF LABOR,
) CIVIL PENALTY PROCEEDINGS
MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH )
ADMINISTRATION (MSHA), ) Master Docket No. 91-1 Petitioner )
) Docket No. VA 91-462
v. ) A.C. No. 44-06333-03508D
)
GOOD TIMES MINING, INC., ) Mine No. 2 Respondent )
) Docket No. KENT 91-1051
) A.C. No. 15-16410-03514D
)
) Mine No. 3

ORDER OF DISMISSAL

Before: Judge Broderick

On December 8, 1992, the Secretary filed a motion to dismiss these proceedings on the grounds that on August 6, 1991, Respondent Good Times Mining, Inc., and Jay Wallace, principal of Respondent, entered into plea agreements, agreeing to plead guilty to charges of conspiracy to defraud an agency of the United States in connection with the civil violations charged herein. Respondent contracted with Triangle Research to handle its dust sampling program. Triangle's principal and agent admitted falsifying the samples submitted to MSHA, and admitted that on numerous occasions they blew air on the filter surfaces of manufactured dust samples. Harry White and Ronald Ellis have been convicted of defrauding the Government, and have received prison sentences. Respondent provided Triangle with signed blank dust data cards which were submitted to MSHA with the samples.

On August 6, 1992, Judge James C. Turk of the Western District of Virginia, sentenced Good Times Mining, Inc. to pay a fine of $30,000 of which $15,000 was suspended and to 2 years probation. Jay Wallace was sentenced to pay a fine of $5,000 and to 2 years probation and 2 months home confinement. As part of the plea agreement, the Secretary agreed to move to dismiss pending civil penalty proceedings against Respondent for violations of the laws governing the dust sampling program.

I conclude that under the circumstances dismissal of these proceedings effectuates the purposes of the Mine Act.

Accordingly, these proceedings are DISMISSED.

James A. Broderick
Administrative Law Judge

Distribution:

Douglas N. White, Esq., Mark R. Malecki, Esq., Office of the Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor, 4015 Wilson Boulevard, Suite 400, Arlington, Virginia 22203 (Certified Mail)

Ronald L. King, Esq., Robertson, Cecil, King & Pruitt, 237 Main Street, Drawer 1560, Grundy, Virginia 24614 (Certified Mail)

Hand Delivered to Lead Defense Counsel Committee

/fcca

What applies to your situation today?

This order bound one employer. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent against your facts, with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace