In Re: Contest of Respirable Dust Sample Alteration Citations
In Re: Contest of Respirable Dust Sample Alteration Citations (FMSHRC 91-1): Master docket dismissed
Apply this to your situation
This order from 1998 bound only the parties to this case; it isn't precedent. Ask about your situation and see what the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent say, with citations.
Plain-English summary
This master docket concerned contests involving respirable dust sample alteration citations. The Commission advised that MSHA had issued notices on November 5, 1998, stating that the citations had been vacated for all operators with cases pending under the master docket. Chief Administrative Law Judge Paul Merlin dismissed all cases in the master docket.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): None stated in the decision.
- Outcome: All cases in the master docket were dismissed after MSHA notices stated that the citations had been vacated.
- Key point: The master docket was closed because the underlying citations had been vacated.
Full text (FMSHRC public release)
FEDERAL MINE SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW
COMMISSION
1730 K STREET, N.W ., SUITE 6 0 0
W A SHINGTON, D .C. 2 0 0 0 6
December 1, 1998
IN RE: CONTEST OF RESPIRABLE :
DUST SAMPLE ALTERATION : MASTER DOCKET No. 91-1
CITATIONS :
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
The Commission has been advised that on November 5, 1998, the Mine Safety and Health
Administration issued notices that citations have been vacated to all operators with cases pending
under the Master Docket, a list of which is attached to this order.
Accordingly, it is ORDERED that all cases in the Master Docket are hereby
DISMISSED.
Paul Merlin
Chief Administrative Law Judge
attachment
1333
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read what one judge decided for one employer in 1998, and it binds only those parties. Ezel checks the current MSHA standards and Commission precedent and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.