Robert Aaron Greenberg, Esquire, and The Law Firm of Tomar, Parks, Seliger, Simonoff & Adourian (Commission decision, August 6, 1986)
Disciplinary proceeding closed without findings
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1986, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Commission received an apology from attorney Robert Aaron Greenberg and his law firm concerning the circumstances that led to a disciplinary proceeding. They also assured the Commission that they would use their best efforts to follow Commission rules and orders in the future. Because the events were old and the Commission accepted the apology and assurances, it terminated the proceeding. The Commission made no findings on the disputed matters and directed that no inferences be drawn.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): None.
- Outcome: Disciplinary proceeding closed without factual findings.
- Key point: Closure based on an accepted apology and future-compliance assurances did not resolve the underlying allegations.
Full text (OSHRC public release)
Docket No. 86-0651-D
DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDING
regarding
ROBERT AARON GREENBERG, ESQUIRE,
and
THE LAW FIRM OF TOMAR, PARKS,
SELIGER, SIMONOFF & ADOURIAN.
OSHRC Docket No-86-651-D
ORDER
Before: BUCKLEY, Chairman; RADER and WALL,
Commissioners.
BY THE COMMISSION:
The Commission has received an apology from Robert
Aaron Greenberg, Esquire and the law firm of Tomar, Seliger, Simonoff, Adourian & O'Brien regarding the circumstances surrounding this proceeding and assurances that the parties will use their best efforts in the future to act in conformance with Commission rules and orders. Because the events involved in this proceeding are old and because the Commission accepts the apology and assurances that it has received, we consider it appropriate to terminate the proceeding on this basis alone. We make no findings with regard to the matters at issue nor should any inferences be drawn. The case is hereby CLOSED.
FOR THE COMMISSION
Ray H. Darling, Jr.
Executive Secretary
DATED: August 6, 1986
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace