Serstel Corporation (Commission decision, December 19, 1986)

Secretary withdraws two construction citations

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
85-0362
Decided
December 19, 1986
Outcome
Citations vacated
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-07-26

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1986, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1986
The OSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official OSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official OSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (oshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

An OSHRC judge affirmed citations against Serstel Corporation under a general personal-protective-equipment standard and a material-hoist standard. Serstel petitioned for Commission review, review was directed, and the Commission issued a briefing order. After further review, the Secretary decided that continued litigation was not warranted and withdrew the citation. The Commission granted the withdrawal. The official release does not include the judge's decision or state the underlying facts, classifications, or penalties.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): 29 C.F.R. § 1926.28(a); 29 C.F.R. § 1926.553(a)(4)
  • Outcome: Both citation allegations withdrawn.
  • Key point: The Commission ended the case after the Secretary withdrew the citation during review.

Full text (OSHRC public release)

Docket No. 85-0362

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.

SERSTEL CORPORATION

Respondent.

OSHRC DOCKET NO. 85-0362

ORDER

The Commission grants the Secretary's motion to withdraw the citation.

FOR THE COMMISSION

RAY H. DARLING, JR.

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY

Dated: December 19, 1986

WILLIAM E. BROCK, SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.

SERSTEL CORPORATION,

Respondent.

OSHRC DOCKET No. 85-0362

NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF CITATION

Complainant, William E. Brock, Secretary of Labor, hereby states that he is withdrawing his citation which alleges violations of 29 CFR 1926.28(a) and 29 CFR 1926.553(a)(4). As reasons therefore, the Secretary states:

  1. Respondent filed a petition for review of the administrative law judge's decision and
    order affirming the Secretary's citation which alleged violations of 29 CFR 1926.28(a) and 1926.553(a)(4). Review was directed and a briefing order issued.

  2. As a result of further review of this case, the Secretary has determined that continued
    litigation is not warranted. Consequently, we are sending to the party of record this notice of withdrawal. No employee or authorized employee representative elected party status in this case.

Respectfully submitted,

GEORGE R. SALEM

Solicitor of Labor

CYNTHIA L. ATTWOOD

Associate Solicitor for Occupational

Safety & Health

DANIEL J. MICK

Counsel for Regional Trial Litigation

KAREN E. S. BRAY

Attorney

The Administrative Law Judge decision in this matter is unavailable in this format. To obtain a copy of this document, please request one from our Public Information Office by e-mail ( [email protected] ), telephone (202-606-5398), fax (202-606-5050), or TTY (202-606-5386).

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace