Con-Lin Construction Company (Commission decision, December 5, 1983)
Notice of contest reinstated
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1983, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The judge affirmed a serious citation after finding Con-Lin's written notice of contest untimely. The record showed, however, that during the statutory contest period Con-Lin attended an informal conference, disputed the Secretary's position, and regarded that action as contesting the citation. The Commission set aside the judge's order, reinstated the notice of contest, and remanded for proceedings on the merits.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): The official release does not identify the standard underlying the serious citation.
- Outcome: Default affirmance set aside; notice of contest reinstated; case remanded.
- Key point: A timely informal conference that clearly disputes the Secretary's position may support reinstatement when the employer understood it to constitute a contest.
Full text (OSHRC public release)
Docket No. 83-0371
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
Complainant,
v.
CON-LIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,
Respondent.
OSHRC Docket No. 83-0371
REMAND ORDER
Administrative Law Judge Irving Sommer affirmed a citation alleging a serious violation on the ground that Respondent's notice of contest had been untimely filed. The record, however, indicates that within the time period for contesting a citation Respondent met with representatives of the Secretary at an informal conference. Respondent disputed the Secretary's position as expressed at this conference and regards the conference as a contest of the citation. In these circumstances, we set aside the judge's order and reinstate the notice of contest. See Merritt Electric Co., Inc ., 81 OSAHRC 75/D4, 9 BNA OSHC 2088, 1981 CCH OSHD 25,556 (No. 77-3772, 1981). Accordingly, we remand this matter for proceedings on the merits of the alleged violation.
SO ORDERED.
FOR THE COMMISSION
Ray H. Darling, Jr.
Executive Secretary
DATED: DEC 5 1983
The Administrative Law Judge decision in this matter is unavailable in this format. To obtain a copy of this document, please request one from our Public Information Office By e-mail ( [email protected] ), telephone (202-606-5398), fax (202-606-5050), or TTY (202-606-5386).
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace