Con-Lin Construction Company (Commission decision, December 5, 1983)

Notice of contest reinstated

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
83-0371
Decided
December 5, 1983
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-07-26

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1983, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1983
The OSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This remand order did not finally resolve the case. The Commission reinstated the notice of contest and sent the alleged violation back for a hearing on the merits. Check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official OSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official OSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (oshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The judge affirmed a serious citation after finding Con-Lin's written notice of contest untimely. The record showed, however, that during the statutory contest period Con-Lin attended an informal conference, disputed the Secretary's position, and regarded that action as contesting the citation. The Commission set aside the judge's order, reinstated the notice of contest, and remanded for proceedings on the merits.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): The official release does not identify the standard underlying the serious citation.
  • Outcome: Default affirmance set aside; notice of contest reinstated; case remanded.
  • Key point: A timely informal conference that clearly disputes the Secretary's position may support reinstatement when the employer understood it to constitute a contest.

Full text (OSHRC public release)

Docket No. 83-0371

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.

CON-LIN CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,

Respondent.

OSHRC Docket No. 83-0371

REMAND ORDER

Administrative Law Judge Irving Sommer affirmed a citation alleging a serious violation on the ground that Respondent's notice of contest had been untimely filed. The record, however, indicates that within the time period for contesting a citation Respondent met with representatives of the Secretary at an informal conference. Respondent disputed the Secretary's position as expressed at this conference and regards the conference as a contest of the citation. In these circumstances, we set aside the judge's order and reinstate the notice of contest. See Merritt Electric Co., Inc ., 81 OSAHRC 75/D4, 9 BNA OSHC 2088, 1981 CCH OSHD 25,556 (No. 77-3772, 1981). Accordingly, we remand this matter for proceedings on the merits of the alleged violation.

SO ORDERED.

FOR THE COMMISSION

Ray H. Darling, Jr.

Executive Secretary

DATED: DEC 5 1983

The Administrative Law Judge decision in this matter is unavailable in this format. To obtain a copy of this document, please request one from our Public Information Office By e-mail ( [email protected] ), telephone (202-606-5398), fax (202-606-5050), or TTY (202-606-5386).

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace