Kut-Kwick Corporation
EAJA fee claim settled for $6,500
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1985, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Kut-Kwick had an application pending for attorney’s fees and expenses under the Equal Access to Justice Act. The parties settled the entire fee claim without further litigation. The Department of Labor agreed to pay $6,500 without conceding that Kut-Kwick was legally entitled to fees. In exchange, Kut-Kwick withdrew its application and waived all other attorney-fee and expense claims connected with the original citations and the EAJA proceeding. The Commission approved the agreement, granted withdrawal of the application, and vacated the direction for review.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): None identified in this EAJA release.
- Outcome: EAJA application withdrawn in exchange for a $6,500 payment.
- Key point: The settlement fully resolved the company’s fee claims without an admission that fees were legally owed.
Full text (OSHRC public release)
Docket No. 83-0261
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
Complainant,
v.
KUT-KWICK CORPORATION,
Respondent.
OSHRC DOCKET NO. 83-0261
ORDER
The Commission approves the settlement agreement. The Commission treats the
Respondent's notice of withdrawal as a motion to withdraw its application for fees and
expenses, and grants the motion. The Commission further vacates the Direction for
Review in this case.
FOR THE COMMISSION
Ray H. Darling, Jr.
Executive Secretary
Dated: APR 10 1985
RAYMOND J. DONOVAN, SECRETARY OF LABOR,
Complainant,
v.
KUT-KWIK CORPORATION,
Respondent.
OSHRC DOCKET
NO. 83-0261(EAJA)
JOINT NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF APPLICATION
FOR FEES AND EXPENSES UNDER THE EQUAL
ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT
Complainant, by his undersigned attorney, and
respondent Kut-Kwik Corporation, by its undersigned attorney, hereby notify the
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission ("Commission") that the
above-noted proceeding presently before the Commission on review of the decision of the
administrative law judge's decision on the issue of fees and expenses under the Equal
Access to Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. � 504 ("EAJA"), has been concluded by
Stipulation and Settlement with respect to the pending claim in its entirety. A copy
of the Agreement entered into by the parties is attached hereto.
Accordingly, there being no controversy remaining between the parties, Kut-Kwik
Corporation withdraws its application under the EAJA and the instant proceedings are
terminated.
FOR THE COMPLAINANT
KENNETH A. HELLMAN, ESQ.
FOR THE RESPONDENT
JOHN P. CAMPBELL, ESQ.
RAYMOND J. DONOVAN, SECRETARY OF LABOR,
Complainant,
v.
KUT-KWIK CORPORATION,
Respondent.
OSHRC DOCKET NO. 83-0261 (EAJA)
STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
Complainant, by his undersigned attorneys, and respondent, Kut-Kwik Corporation, by its
undersigned attorney, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:
1. The parties wish to settle the
application of respondent for attorney's fees and expenses under the Equal Access to
Justice Act, 5 U.S.C. � 504 (EAJA), without the need for further litigation.
2. Without conceding that respondent has any rights whatsoever to attorney's fees
and expenses under the EAJA in the instant proceeding, complainant agrees in settlement of
respondent's application to pay to respondent by check drawn from the United States
Department of Labor, the amount of $6,500.00. The check shall be made payable to
Kut-Kwik Corporation, shall be issued to the above-named within ninety days of final
execution of this agreement, and shall constitute full and complete settlement of
respondent's application.
3. In consideration for the $6,500.00 check for attorney's fees and expenses
described in paragraph (2) above, respondent hereby agrees to waive all other claims for
attorney's fees and expenses incurred in this case both on the merits of the original
citations and on its application under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
FOR THE COMPLAINANT
KENNETH A. HELLMAN, ESQ.
FOR THE RESPONDENT
JOHN P. CAMPBELL, ESQ.
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 1985. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.