National Railroad Passenger Corporation (Commission decision, April 27, 1983)

Citation vacation conditionally approved

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
82-0785
Decided
April 27, 1983
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-07-26

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1983, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1983
The OSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official OSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official OSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (oshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Secretary sought to vacate the citation and proposed penalties against the National Railroad Passenger Corporation. The Commission conditionally affirmed the judge's order granting that request. Approval depended on proof that the dismissal notice was served on employee representatives and posted for unrepresented affected employees, with no employee objections filed within 10 days after service. The Commission stated that these employee-service requirements apply to all withdrawals and overruled earlier decisions to the contrary.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): None. The order addresses Commission service and withdrawal procedures.
  • Outcome: Citation and proposed penalties conditionally vacated, subject to employee notice and an opportunity to object.
  • Key point: A citation withdrawal requires service on represented employees, posting for unrepresented affected employees, and time for employee objections.

Full text (OSHRC public release)

Docket No. 82-0785

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.

NATIONAL RAILROAD PASSENGER CORP.,

Respondent.

OSHRC DOCKET NO. 82-0785

CONDITIONAL ORDER APPROVING VACATION OF CITATION

The judge's order granting the Secretary's motion to vacate the citation and proposed penalties is conditionally affirmed subject to the following: (1) that the Commission receive proof of service of the Secretary's "Notice of Dismissal" by first class mail or personal delivery on any authorized employee representatives, consistent with Commission Rules 7 (c) and (f), 29 C.F.R. 2200.7(c) and (f); (2) that the Commission receive proof of service of the "Notice of Dismissal" on unrepresented affected employees by posting at or near the place where the citation is to be posted, see Commission Rule 7(g), 29 C.F.R. 2200.7(g); and (3) that no objections are filed by or on behalf of affected employees within 10 days following service, see Commission Rule 37, 29 C.F.R. 2200.37. These forms of service for all withdrawals are required, consistent with the principles stated in Mobil Oil Co., 82 OSAHRC 45/A2, 10 BNA OSHC 1905, 1982 CCH OSHD 26,187 (No. 77-4386, 1982), appeal filed, No. 82-4171 (2d Cir. Oct. 5, 1982); See also Republic Steel Corp., 10 BNA OSHC 2222, 1982 CCH OSHD 26,326 (No. 81-656, 1982), appeals filed, Nos.83-3058 and 83-3060 (6th Cir. Jan. 28 and 30, 1983); 29 U.S.C. 659(c). Previous Commission decisions holding to the contrary are therefore overruled. Pacific Intermountain Express Co., 74 OSAHRC 67/F10, 2 BNA OSHC 1228, 1974-75 CCH OSHD
  �18,718 (No. 4303, 1974); Newspaper Agency Corp., 74 OSAHRC 27/C2, 1 BNA OSHC 1711, 1973- 74 CCH OSHD 17,785 (No. 1902, 1974).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: APR 27 1983

Ray H. Darling, Jr.

Executive Secretary

The Administrative Law Judge decision in this matter is unavailable in this format. To obtain a copy of this document, please request one from our Public Information Office By e-mail ( [email protected] ), telephone (202-606-5398), fax (202-606-5050), or TTY (202-606-5386).

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace