Metal Bank of America, Inc. (Commission decision, March 20, 1985)

Lead-standard case settled for $2,500

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
82-0422
Decided
March 20, 1985
Outcome
Settled
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-07-26
Cited standards

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1985, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1985
The OSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official OSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official OSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (oshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

OSHA cited Metal Bank for serious violations of the lead standard and proposed a $4,280 penalty. An earlier stipulation withdrew parts of the citation and reduced the proposed penalty for the remaining items to $3,000. Under the final settlement, Metal Bank withdrew its contest and petition for review, and the Secretary reduced the remaining penalty to $2,500. The company stated that it no longer operated metal recovery at the cited facility but agreed to comply with the lead requirements if those operations resumed and to provide the agreement to any successor. The Commission approved the settlement.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): 29 C.F.R. § 1910.1025
  • Outcome: Remaining serious lead items settled for a $2,500 penalty after other parts were withdrawn.
  • Key point: The agreement ended the case and preserved compliance obligations if metal-recovery operations resumed.

Full text (OSHRC public release)

Docket No. 82-0422

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.

METAL BANK OF AMERICA, INC.,

Respondent.

OSHRC DOCKET NO. 82-0422

ORDER

The parties' stipulation and settlement agreement is approved.

FOR THE COMMISSION

Ray H. Darling, Jr.

Executive Secretary

Dated: March 20, 1985

RAYMOND J . DONOVAN, SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.

THE METAL BANK OF AMERICA, INC.,

Respondent.

OSHRC DOCKET NO. 82-0422

Stipulation and Settlement Agreement

The parties have reached an agreement on the settlement of the items in this matter. The parties stipulate as follows:

  1. Respondent is a private business enterprise which employs employees. It is engaged in
    commerce, is subject to the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 and the jurisdiction of the Commission.

  2. As a result of an OSHA inspection at respondent's workplace. OSHA issued to respondent
    a citation for a serious violation of the lead standard, 29 CFR �1910.1025, and a proposed penalty of $4,280.

  3. In a stipulation submitted to Judge Jerome Ditore and accepted by the judge, the
    Secretary agreed to withdraw certain parts of the citation and to reduce the proposed penalty to $3,000 for the remaining items.

  4. Pursuant to the instant agreement, respondent agrees to withdraw its notice of contest
    as to the remaining items before the Commission and also moves to withdraw its petition for review of Judge Ditore's decision of February 24, 1984.

  5. The Secretary hereby agrees to reduce the penalty for the remaining items to $2,500
    which respondent hereby agrees to pay immediately.

  6. Respondent states that it no longer operates a metal recovery operation at the cited
    facility but agrees that if metal recovery operations are resumed in whole or in part, it will comply with the OSHA Act and the cited standards. Respondent further agrees that a copy of this stipulation and settlement agreement will be furnished to any successor in interest.

SIGNED: FEB 25, 1985

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace