Witco Chemical Corp.
Citation 2 remanded for further proceedings
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1981, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The parties settled citation 1, and the judge approved that agreement; it became a final Commission order and was not before the Commission on review. Because the settlement did not address citation 2, the Commission remanded the case to the administrative law judge for further proceedings on that citation and the Secretary's request for more time to file a complaint.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): None identified in the Commission order.
- Outcome: Citation 2 remanded for further proceedings; citation 1 settlement became final.
- Key point: A partial settlement did not dispose of the separate citation still requiring adjudication.
Full text (OSHRC public release)
Docket No. 81-1651
WITCO CHEMICAL CORP.
�
OSHRC Docket No. 81-1651
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
November 30, 1981
COUNSEL:
�
[*1]
�
Office of the Solicitor, USDOL
James E. White, Reg. Sol., USDOL
Keith M. Pyburn, Jr., for the employer
OPINION:
ORDER OF REMAND
This case is before us under Section 12(j) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. �
�
661(i).
�
The Secretary of Labor on October 28 moved the Commission for a remand of this matter to the administrative law judge for disposition of citation no. 2 and for an extension of time to file a complaint regarding citation no. 2.
The parties have entered into a settlement agreement, but that agreement does not relate to citation no. 2.
�
Therefore, this case is hereby remanded for further proceedings respecting citation no. 2.
The settlement agreement between the parties, which relates only to citation no. 1, was approved by the judge and is not before us on review.
�
The agreement becomes a final order of the Commission.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
�
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 1981. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.