C.F. & I. Steel Corporation (Commission decision, March 2, 1984)
Coke-oven citation withdrawn and dismissed
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1984, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A judge had affirmed a coke-oven emissions citation against C.F. & I. Steel, and the Commission granted the employer's petition for review. The Secretary later learned that the company had permanently stopped operating the coke-oven facility and determined that further adjudication was unwarranted. The Commission granted the withdrawal, vacated the judge's order, and dismissed the citation and complaint.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): 29 C.F.R. § 1910.1029(f)(4)(i) (coke-oven emissions).
- Outcome: Judge's order vacated; citation and complaint dismissed.
- Key point: The Commission granted withdrawal after the cited facility permanently ceased operations and the Secretary declined further adjudication.
Full text (OSHRC public release)
Docket No. 81-0454
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
Complainant,
v.
C.F. & I STEEL CORPORATION,
Respondent.
OSHRC Docket No. 81-0454
ORDER
The Commission treats the Secretary's notice of withdrawal of citation as a motion to withdraw the citation. The Commission grants the Secretary's motion, vacates the order of the Administrative Law Judge, and dismisses the citation and complaint.
FOR THE COMMISSION
Ray H. Darling, Jr.
Executive Secretary
Dated: MAR 2 1984
RAYMOND J. DONOVAN, SECRETARY OF LABOR,
Complainant,
v.
C.F. & I. STEEL CORPORATION,
Respondent,
and
UNITED STEEL WORKERS OF AMERICA,
AFL-CIO, Local 2102,
Authorized Employee
Representative.
OSHRC DOCKET
No. 81-0454
SECRETARY'S NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF CITATION
In a decision dated May 24, 1982, Administrative Law Judge James A. Cronin, Jr. affirmed a citation issued to respondent for a violation of 29 CFR 1910.1029(f)(4)(i), which citation had been issued by the Secretary on January 21, 1981. Respondent's subsequent petition for discretionary review of the judge's decision regarding this citation was granted by the Commission.
Complainant has been informed by counsel for respondent and the authorized employee representative that respondent has permanently ceased operation of it's coke oven facility at the worksite in question. In addition, after further review of the record in this case the Secretary has determined that further adjudication of this matter is not warranted. Copies of this notice have been served on respondent and the authorized employee representative.
Wherefore, the Secretary hereby withdraws the citation for violation of 29 CFR 1910.1029(f)(4)(1) and requests that the judge's decision on the citation be set aside.
Respectfully submitted,
FRANCIS X. LILLY
Solicitor of Labor
FRANK A. WHITE
Associate Solicitor for Occupational
Safety and Health
DANIEL J. NICK
Counsel for Regional Trial Litigation
KENNETH A. HELLMAN
Assistant Counsel for Regional
Trial Litigation
The Administrative Law Judge decision in this matter is unavailable in this format. To obtain a copy of this document, please request one from our Public Information Office be e-mail ( [email protected] ), telephone (202-606-5398), fax (202-606-5050), or TTY (202-606-5386).
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace