Jenn-Air Corporation
Abatement-modification order set aside and remanded
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1981, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Jenn-Air filed an amended petition seeking modification of an abatement requirement, and the judge approved it. Before the parties received that order, Jenn-Air asked the judge to delay action so the parties could meet. The Secretary agreed, the union did not object, and all parties later supported a remand. The Commission set aside the approval order and returned the matter to the judge to consider Jenn-Air's objections.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): None identified in the decision.
- Outcome: Abatement-modification order set aside; matter remanded to the judge.
- Key point: The Commission may remand by agreement so the judge can consider objections that were filed before the parties received the original order.
Full text (OSHRC public release)
Docket No. 80-6256-P
JENN-AIR CORPORATION
OSHRC Docket No. 80-6256-P
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
March 19, 1981
�
[*1]
�
Before: BARNAKO, Acting Chairman; CLEARY and COTTINE, Commissioners.
�
COUNSEL:
Baruch A. Fellner, Office of the Solicitor, USDOL
Mr. Herman Grant, Solicitor, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Office of the Solicitor
Edith E. Holiday, for the employer
OPINION:
DECISION
BY THE COMMISSION:
An order of Administrative Law Judge F. Daley Abels, approving an amended petition for modification of abatement filed by Petitioner, Jenn-Air Corp., is before the Commission pursuant to a direction for review by Commissioner Cottine issued under section 12(j), 29 U.S.C. �
�
661(i), of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. � �
�
651-678.
After the judge entered his order but before it was received by the parties, Petitioner filed a letter with the judge asking that no order be issued until the parties had an opportunity to meet.
�
The Secretary of Labor agreed in the request by Petitioner.
�
The Sheet Metal Workers' Local 503 did not object to the request.
�
Subsequently, as a result of the judge's order, Petitioner filed a petition for discretionary review requesting that the case be remanded.
�
The petition states that all parties are agreeable to the remand
Under the circumstances, we set aside the order of [*2]
�
Administrative Law Judge F. Daley Abels, dated November 7, 1980.
�
Cf. The Anaconda Company, Wire and Cable Division, 80 OSAHRC , 9 BNA OSHC 1159, 1980 CCH OSHD P24,917 (No. 79-5449, 1980) (case remanded for purposes other than judicial error).
�
Accordingly, this action is remanded to the judge for consideration of the objections filed by Petitioner.
SO ORDERED.
�
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 1981. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.