OSHRC Commission decision Docket 80-6256 Decided March 19, 1981 Remanded

Jenn-Air Corporation

Abatement-modification order set aside and remanded

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1981, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1981
The OSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official OSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official OSHRC release. The full text is the Commission's own document.
Read the official release (oshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Jenn-Air filed an amended petition seeking modification of an abatement requirement, and the judge approved it. Before the parties received that order, Jenn-Air asked the judge to delay action so the parties could meet. The Secretary agreed, the union did not object, and all parties later supported a remand. The Commission set aside the approval order and returned the matter to the judge to consider Jenn-Air's objections.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): None identified in the decision.
  • Outcome: Abatement-modification order set aside; matter remanded to the judge.
  • Key point: The Commission may remand by agreement so the judge can consider objections that were filed before the parties received the original order.

Full text (OSHRC public release)

Docket No. 80-6256-P

JENN-AIR CORPORATION

OSHRC Docket No. 80-6256-P

Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

March 19, 1981


[*1]

Before: BARNAKO, Acting Chairman; CLEARY and COTTINE, Commissioners.

COUNSEL:

Baruch A. Fellner, Office of the Solicitor, USDOL

Mr. Herman Grant, Solicitor, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Office of the Solicitor

Edith E. Holiday, for the employer

OPINION:

DECISION

BY THE COMMISSION:

An order of Administrative Law Judge F. Daley Abels, approving an amended petition for modification of abatement filed by Petitioner, Jenn-Air Corp., is before the Commission pursuant to a direction for review by Commissioner Cottine issued under section 12(j), 29 U.S.C. �

661(i), of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. � �

651-678.

After the judge entered his order but before it was received by the parties, Petitioner filed a letter with the judge asking that no order be issued until the parties had an opportunity to meet.

The Secretary of Labor agreed in the request by Petitioner.

The Sheet Metal Workers' Local 503 did not object to the request.

Subsequently, as a result of the judge's order, Petitioner filed a petition for discretionary review requesting that the case be remanded.

The petition states that all parties are agreeable to the remand

Under the circumstances, we set aside the order of [*2]

Administrative Law Judge F. Daley Abels, dated November 7, 1980.

Cf. The Anaconda Company, Wire and Cable Division, 80 OSAHRC    , 9 BNA OSHC 1159, 1980 CCH OSHD P24,917 (No. 79-5449, 1980) (case remanded for purposes other than judicial error).

Accordingly, this action is remanded to the judge for consideration of the objections filed by Petitioner.

SO ORDERED.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read Commission precedent from 1981. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.