Tonawanda Coke Corporation (Commission decision, March 9, 1984)
Citation item withdrawn
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1984, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A judge had affirmed item 4 of a serious citation against Tonawanda Coke, and the Commission granted review of the employer's challenge. After reconsidering the record, the Secretary concluded that further adjudication was unwarranted and withdrew the item. The Commission treated the notice as a motion and granted it.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): 29 C.F.R. § 1910.1029(4)(i), as identified in the official release.
- Outcome: Citation item 4 withdrawn.
- Key point: The Commission granted the Secretary's withdrawal after the item had been affirmed by the judge and directed for review.
Full text (OSHRC public release)
Docket No. 80-4850
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
Complainant,
v.
TONAWANDA COKE CORPORATION,
Respondent.
OSHRC Docket No. 80-4850
ORDER
The Commission treats the Secretary's notice of withdrawal of item 4 of the citation as a motion to withdraw that item of the citation, and grants the Secretary's motion.
FOR THE COMMISSION
Ray H. Darling, Jr.
Executive Secretary
Dated: MAR 9 1984
RAYMOND J. DONOVAN, SECRETARY OF LABOR,
Complainant,
v.
TONAWANDA COKE CORPORATION,
Respondent.
LOCAL 12572, UNITED STEELWORKERS OF
AMERICA,
Authorized Employee Representative.
OSHRC Docket No. 80-4850
SECRETARY'S NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF CITATION
In a decision dated March 15, 1983, Administrative Law Judge David J. Knight affirmed a serious citation issued to respondent for a violation 29 CFR 1910.1029(4)(i), which citation had been issued by the Secretary on July 25, 1980. Respondent's subsequent petition for discretionary review of the judge's decision regarding this citation item was granted by the Commission on April 28, 1983.
After further review of the record in this case the Secretary has determined that further adjudication of this matter is not warranted. Copies of this notice have been served on respondent and the authorized employee representative.
WHEREFORE, the Secretary hereby withdraws item 4 of the citation issued to respondent on July 25, 1980 alleging a serious violation of 29 CFR 1910.1029(4)(i) and requests that the judge's decision on this item be set aside.
Respectfully submitted,
FRANCIS X. LILLY
Deputy Solicitor of Labor
FRANK A. WHITE
Associate Solicitor for
Occupational Safety & Health
DANIEL J. MICK
Counsel for Regional
Trial Litigation
LINTON W. HENGERER
Attorney
The Administrative Law Judge decision in this matter is unavailable in this format. To obtain a copy of this document, please request one from our Public Information Office by e-mail ( [email protected]
), telephone (202-606-5398), fax (202-606-5050), or TTY (202-606-5386).
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace