General Services Administration, Region 9 and American Federation of Government Employees, Local 3723 (Authority decision, January 29, 1982)
GSA Region 9 (FLRA 8-CA-790): stipulated dispute returned for regional settlement action
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Authority precedent from 1982, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
FLRA remand decision. The Authority returns the case to Region 8 for action following the parties' agreement to settle. This order makes no unfair labor practice ruling and leaves regional action pending, so it does not present a final judicial-review period under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a).
Plain-English summary
An unfair labor practice case involving GSA Region 9 and AFGE Local 3723 had been transferred to the Authority on the parties' stipulation. After the parties agreed to settle, counsel for the Authority's General Counsel asked that the case be returned to Region 8. The Authority granted that request and remanded the case for appropriate regional action. The order gives no settlement terms or ruling on the underlying dispute.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: Unfair labor practice proceeding under 5 U.S.C. § 7118.
- Outcome: Case remanded to Region 8 for action following the parties' settlement agreement.
- Key point: The Authority returned the stipulated case to the region without deciding its merits.
Full text (FLRA public release)
[ v07 p785 ]
07:0785(131)CA
The decision of the Authority follows:
7 FLRA No. 131
GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
REGION 9, SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA
(Respondent)
and
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL
3723, AFL-CIO
(Charging Party)
Case No. 8-CA-790
ORDER
BY MOTION TO REMAND DATED DECEMBER 15, 1981, THE COUNSEL FOR THE
GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY REQUESTED THAT
THE ABOVE-ENTITLED CASE, TRANSFERRED TO THE AUTHORITY UPON STIPULATION
BY THE PARTIES, BE REMANDED TO REGION 8, PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES'
AGREEMENT TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE WHICH WAS INVOLVED IN THE STIPULATION.
ACCORDINGLY, THE CASE IS HEREBY REMANDED FOR APPROPRIATE REGIONAL
ACTION.
FOR THE AUTHORITY.
ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., JANUARY 29, 1982
JAMES J. SHEPARD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace