General Services Administration, Region 9 and American Federation of Government Employees, Local 3723 (Authority decision, January 29, 1982)

GSA Region 9 (FLRA 8-CA-790): stipulated dispute returned for regional settlement action

Decision type
Authority decision
Docket
8-CA-790
Decided
January 29, 1982
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Authority precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-06

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Authority precedent from 1982, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1982
The federal labor-relations law may have been amended, and later Authority or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FLRA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (flra.gov)

FLRA remand decision. The Authority returns the case to Region 8 for action following the parties' agreement to settle. This order makes no unfair labor practice ruling and leaves regional action pending, so it does not present a final judicial-review period under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a).

Plain-English summary

An unfair labor practice case involving GSA Region 9 and AFGE Local 3723 had been transferred to the Authority on the parties' stipulation. After the parties agreed to settle, counsel for the Authority's General Counsel asked that the case be returned to Region 8. The Authority granted that request and remanded the case for appropriate regional action. The order gives no settlement terms or ruling on the underlying dispute.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Unfair labor practice proceeding under 5 U.S.C. § 7118.
  • Outcome: Case remanded to Region 8 for action following the parties' settlement agreement.
  • Key point: The Authority returned the stipulated case to the region without deciding its merits.

Full text (FLRA public release)

[ v07 p785 ]

07:0785(131)CA

The decision of the Authority follows:

7 FLRA No. 131

GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION,
REGION 9, SAN FRANCISCO,
CALIFORNIA
(Respondent)

and

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF
GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES, LOCAL
3723, AFL-CIO
(Charging Party)

Case No. 8-CA-790

ORDER

BY MOTION TO REMAND DATED DECEMBER 15, 1981, THE COUNSEL FOR THE
GENERAL COUNSEL OF THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY REQUESTED THAT
THE ABOVE-ENTITLED CASE, TRANSFERRED TO THE AUTHORITY UPON STIPULATION
BY THE PARTIES, BE REMANDED TO REGION 8, PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES'
AGREEMENT TO SETTLE THE DISPUTE WHICH WAS INVOLVED IN THE STIPULATION.
ACCORDINGLY, THE CASE IS HEREBY REMANDED FOR APPROPRIATE REGIONAL
ACTION.

FOR THE AUTHORITY.

ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., JANUARY 29, 1982

JAMES J. SHEPARD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace