OSHRC Commission decision Docket 79-6864 Decided July 31, 1981 Remanded

J. I. Hass Company, Inc.

Late-contest facts remanded after court ruling

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1981, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1981
The OSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official OSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official OSHRC release. The full text is the Commission's own document.
Read the official release (oshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Third Circuit reversed the Commission's prior late-contest ruling and required further findings. On remand, the Commission sent the case back to the administrative law judge to determine the facts surrounding delivery and receipt of the citations and penalty notices and to decide whether J. I. Hass could obtain relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b).

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): None identified in the Commission order.
  • Outcome: Case remanded for evidence and a Rule 60(b) determination.
  • Key point: The judge had to determine actual receipt and equitable relief before treating the citations as final based on an untimely contest.

Full text (OSHRC public release)

Docket No. 79-6864

J. I. HASS COMPANY, INC.

OSHRC Docket No. 79-6864

Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

July 31, 1981

COUNSEL:


[*1]

Office of the Solicitor, USDOL

Francis V. LaRuffa, Regional Solicitor, U.S. Department of Labor

Robert S. Peckar, for the employer

OPINION:

ORDER

This case is before the Commission on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit.

J. I. Hass Co. v. OSHRC and the Secretary of Labor, No. 80-2017 (3d Cir, May 7, 1981).

The Court reversed the Commission's decision and remanded the case n1 to the Commission to ascertain the facts concerning the delivery of citations and notices of penalties to Respondent, J.I. Hass Company, decide whether "receipt of the notice(s)" occurred, and determine whether Respondent may obtain relief pursuant to Rule 60(b) n2 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.

                                  • -Footnotes- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

n1 In this case, Assistant Chief Administrative Law Judge Irving Sommer ruled that the Respondent's notice of contest was not timely filed and, accordingly, the uncontested citations became a final order of the Commission.

Judge Sommer's decision became a final order of the Commission pursuant to �

12(j), 29 U.S.C. �

661(i), of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. � �

651-678, when no Commissioner directed the judge's decision to be reviewed.

n2 The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure will be used in Commission proceedings unless the Commission has adopted a different rule.

Section 12(g), 29 U.S.C. �

661(f), of the Act.

In reliance upon the court's decision in Hass, the Commission has recently held that it will apply Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) in considering untimely notices of contest.


[*2]

                                • -End Footnotes- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Accordingly, the case is remanded to Administrative Law Judge Irving Sommer to take evidence and render a decision consistent with the decision of the court in this case.

SO ORDERED.

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read Commission precedent from 1981. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.