RSR Quemetco, a Division of RSR Corporation, A Corporation (Commission decision, October 1, 1985)

Remanded proceedings authorized to resume

Decision type
Commission decision
Dockets
79-6392, 79-3813, 80-1602, 79-5062
Decided
October 1, 1985
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-07-26

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1985, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1985
The OSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission; remand order
The Commission sent this matter back because the judges still had to conduct the proceedings previously ordered on remand in the four dockets. This order did not finally resolve the case. Check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official OSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official OSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (oshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

The Commission had previously severed these four consolidated RSR matters and remanded them to administrative law judges. The Fifth Circuit stayed those remand orders while it reviewed RSR’s petition. After the court affirmed the Commission’s orders, the Commission directed the assigned judges to proceed with disposition of the cases. The release does not identify the cited standards, underlying merits, or penalties.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): None identified in the release.
  • Outcome: Prior remands allowed to proceed after appellate affirmance.
  • Key point: The administrative law judges could resume the cases once the Fifth Circuit affirmed the Commission’s remand orders.

Full text (OSHRC public release)

Docket No. 79-6392 79-3813 80-1602 79-5062

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.

RSR CORPORATION,

Respondent.

OSHRC Docket No. 79-6392

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.

RSR CORPORATION,

Respondent.

UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA,

AFL-CIO, and LOCAL UNION 3721,

Authorized Employee

Representative.

OSHRC Docket Nos. 79-3813 and 80-1602

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.

RSR QUEMETCO, a Division of RSR Corporation, a corporation,

Respondent.

UNITED STEELWORKERS OF AMERICA,

AFL-CIO, and LOCAL UNION 5554-J,

Authorized Employee

Representative.

OSHRC Docket No. 79-5062

ORDER

On January 31,1983 the Commission issued its decision in the consolidated cases above. 83 OSAHRC 6/A2, 11 BNA OSHC 1163, 1983-84 CCH OSHD 26,429. In that decision it severed docket numbers 79-6392 and 79-5062 and remanded them to the Chief Administrative Law Judge. Docket numbers 79-3813 and 80-1602 were severed and remanded to Administrative Law Judge Dee C. Blythe. Subsequently, the Chief Administrative Law Judge assigned docket numbers 79-6392 and 79-5062 to Administrative Law Judge David G. Oringer.

RSR Corporation filed a petition for review of the consolidated cases to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. On June 3, 1983, the court stayed the Commission's remand orders pending judicial review of the issues raised in the petition. In its decision, the court affirmed the Commission's orders. RSR Corp. v. Brock, 764 F.2d 355 (5th Cir. 1985). Consistent with that decision, the Administrative Law Judges shall proceed with the disposition of these cases.

FOR THE COMMISSION

Ray H. Darling, Jr.

Executive Secretary

Dated: October 1, 1985

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace