OSHRC Commission decision Docket 79-3691 Decided November 21, 1983 Settled

Reda Pump Company, Division of TRW, Inc.

Safety-shoe item settled

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1983, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1983
The OSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official OSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official OSHRC release. The full text is the Commission's own document.
Read the official release (oshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

A judge affirmed a personal-protective-equipment citation based on Reda Pump's failure to require engineers working with hourly employees during pump assembly and disassembly to wear safety shoes. After obtaining Commission review, the company adopted the safety-shoe requirement, represented that the condition was abated, withdrew its contest to the item, and agreed to pay $280. The Commission approved the settlement.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): 29 C.F.R. § 1910.132(a) (personal protective equipment).
  • Outcome: Citation item resolved by settlement; $280 penalty.
  • Key point: The employer resolved the reviewed item by requiring safety shoes for participating engineers, confirming abatement, and withdrawing its contest.

Full text (OSHRC public release)

Docket No. 79-3691

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.

REDA PUMP COMPANY,

DIVISION OF TRW, INC.,

Respondent.

OSHRC DOCKET No. 79- 3691

ORDER

The parties' Stipulation and Settlement Agreement is approved.

FOR THE COMMISSION

Ray H. Darling

EXECUTIVE SECRETARY

Dated: NOV 21 1983

RAYMOND J. DONOVAN,

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.

REDA PUMP Co.,

Division of TRW, Inc.

Respondent.

OSHRC DOCKET NO. 79-3691

STIPULATION AND SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT

I

The parties have reached agreement on a full and complete settlement of the issues
remaining before the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission.

II

The parties stipulate as follows:

(a) On June 17, 1980, the Respondent, Reda Pump Co., Division of TRW, Inc., filed a
petition for discretionary review in the above captioned matter excepting to Judge
LaVecchia's affirmation of Citation 1, Item 1, for Respondent's failure to comply with the
protective equipment standard at 29 CFR 1910.132(a). This petition was granted by
Commissioner Cottine on July 17, 1980.

(b) Subsequent to the decision of the administrative law judge, Respondent did, in fact,
require its engineers who are participating in and working with the plant hourly employees
in the assembly and disassembly of pumps to wear safety shoes while on the plant floor
observing and engaged in the assembly and disassembly of pumps, and Respondent hereby
represents that the conditions alleged in the citation have been abated.

(c) Respondent hereby agrees to withdraw its notice of contest in the instant proceeding
as to Citation 1, Item 1.

(d) Respondent hereby agrees to pay a penalty of $280.00 for the alleged violation.

(e) Respondent hereby agrees to post this Stipulation and Settlement Agreement in
accordance with Commission Rules 7 and 100(c).

WHEREFORE, the parties request that this Stipulation and Settlement Agreement be approved
by the Commission.

Dated this 1st day of June, 1983.

The Administrative Law Judge decision in this matter is unavailable in this format. To
obtain a copy of this document, please request one from our Public Information Office By
e-mail ( [email protected] ), telephone
(202-606-5398), fax (202-606-5050), or TTY (202-606-5386).

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read Commission precedent from 1983. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.