Olin Corporation (Commission decision, December 23, 1982)

Noise-control feasibility remanded for new evidence

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
78-5919
Decided
December 23, 1982
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-07-26
Cited standards

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1982, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1982
The OSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
The Commission sent the noise citation back for new evidence on technological and economic feasibility. This remand did not finally resolve the underlying case. The full text below is from the official OSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official OSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (oshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Olin Corporation faced an alleged violation of the occupational noise standard's feasible-control requirement. After an intervening Supreme Court decision, the Commission abandoned its prior cost-benefit test and treated feasibility as technological and economic achievability. It vacated the judge's ruling and remanded the case for additional evidence and reconsideration under that standard.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): 29 C.F.R. § 1910.95(b)(1).
  • Outcome: The judge's ruling on the alleged noise violation was vacated and the case remanded for further proceedings.
  • Key point: The parties could submit new evidence on whether noise controls were technologically and economically achievable.

Full text (OSHRC public release)

Docket No. 78-5919

OLIN CORPORATION

OSHRC Docket No. 78-5919

Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

December 23, 1982

[*1]

Before: CLEARY and COTTINE, Commissioners. *

  • Chairman Rowland took no part in the consideration or decision of the case.

COUNSEL:

Office of the Solicitor, USDOL

Albert Ross, Reg. Sol., USDOL

Ian P. Spier, Assistant Labor Counsel, Olin Corporation, For Employer

OPINION:

ORDER OF REMAND

BY THE COMMISSION:

In accordance with the decision of the U.S. Supreme Court in American Textile Manufacturing Institute, Inc. v. Donovan, 101 S. Ct. 2478 (1981) ("ATMI"), the Commission held that "feasible" under the occupational noise standard means achievable.

The Commission overruled the cost-benefit test of feasibility previously set forth in Continental Can Co., 76 OSAHRC 109/A2, 4 BNA OSHC 1541, 1976-77 CCH OSHD P21,009 (No. 3973, 1976), appeal withdrawn, No. 76-3229 (9th Cir. Apr. 26, 1977), and substituted a test consistent with ATMI.

In view of this intervening change in law, the judge's decision with respect to the alleged violation of section 1910.95(b)(1) is vacated.

The case is remanded for further proceedings, including evidentiary submissions, so that the interrelated [*2]

issues of technological and economic feasibility can be reconsidered in light of the test of feasibility established by Sun Ship, Inc.

SO ORDERED.

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace