Jones & Laughlin Steel Corporation
Court-ordered penalty and classification changes
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1981, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
Acting under a Third Circuit order, the Commission modified previously final judge decisions. The official release reduces a $180 penalty to $90 and changes the related violation's characterization to nonserious, while leaving the judge's decisions unchanged in all other respects. The release does not identify the cited standard or describe the underlying workplace condition.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): Not identified in the Commission order.
- Outcome: Violation reclassified as nonserious and $180 penalty reduced to $90; otherwise unchanged.
- Key point: The Commission implemented the court of appeals' mandate by making only the specified classification and penalty changes.
Full text (OSHRC public release)
Docket Nos. 78-1351; 78-2474; 78-2565-E
JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORPORATION
OSHRC Docket Nos. 78-1351; 78-2474; 78-2565-E
Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission
January 30, 1981
�
[*1]
�
Before: CLEARY, Chairman; BARNAKO and COTTINE, Commissioners.
�
COUNSEL:
Baruch A. Fellner, Office of the Solicitor, USDOL
Marshall H. Harris, Reg. Sol., USDOL
John C. Unkovic, for the employer
James R. Haggerty, JONES & LAUGHLIN STEEL CORP., for the employer
George Prenatt, Staff Rep., Safety & Health Department, USWA, for the employees
William George, Staff Rep., District 20, USWA, for the employees
Paddy Grimes, Vice President, Local Union No. 1211, USWA, for the employees
OPINION:
ORDER
BY THE COMMISSION:
In accordance with the order entered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on November 13, 1980, the decisions and orders of Administrative Law Judge Benjamin G. Usher, which became final orders of the Commission pursuant to 29 U.S.C. �
�
661(i) on November 20, 1979, and February 5, 1980, are hereby modified as follows:
�
The penalty is reduced from $180 to $90.
�
[*2]
�
and the characterization of that violation is changed to nonserious.
�
The penalty of $180 assessed for that violation is reduced to $90.
In all other respects, the decisions of the judge are unchanged.
SO ORDERED.
�
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 1981. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.