OSHRC Commission decision Docket 76-1718 Decided May 21, 1980 Remanded

Republic Roofing Corporation

Roof-edge PPE citation remanded under revised burden rule

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1980, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1980
The OSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official OSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official OSHRC release. The full text is the Commission's own document.
Read the official release (oshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

OSHA originally alleged that Republic Roofing failed to guard a roof perimeter, then amended the case to allege that employees lacked personal fall protection. The judge vacated the amended PPE citation because he placed the burden on the Secretary to plead and prove that the equipment was feasible. The Commission had since overruled that burden allocation. It set aside the ruling and remanded the case for reconsideration under current precedent, including the employer's other arguments if necessary.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): 29 U.S.C. § 654(a)(2); 29 C.F.R. § 1926.28(a); 29 C.F.R. § 1926.500(d)(1)
  • Outcome: The order vacating the amended PPE citation was set aside, and the case was remanded for reconsideration
  • Key point: The roof-edge PPE allegation must be decided under the Commission's current allocation of the feasibility burden

Full text (OSHRC public release)

Docket No. 76-1718

1 of 202 DOCUMENTS

TURNER COMPANY

A. SCHONBEK & CO., INC.

NORANDA ALUMINUM, INC.

GENERAL MOTORS CORP., GM ASSEMBLY DIV.

ALLIED PLANT MAINTENANCE CO. OF OKLAHOMA, INC.

CLEMENT FOOD COMPANY

MILLCON CORPORATION

FWA DRILLING COMPANY, INC.

CCI, INC.

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY

CONSOLIDATED ALUMINUM CORPORATION

THE BRONZE CRAFT CORPORATION

CARGILL, INC.

CHAPMAN CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.

GALLO MECHANICAL CONTRACTORS, INC.

SPECIAL METALS CORPORATION

WILLAMETTE IRON AND STEEL COMPANY

NASHUA CORPORATION

WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION

RESEARCH-COTTRELL, INC.

ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING & DRYDOCK CO.

NEWPORT NEWS SHIPBUILDING & DRYDOCK CO.

BUNKOFF CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, FRIGIDAIRE DIVISION

HARRIS BROTHERS ROOFING CO.

GENERAL DIVERS COMPANY

ORMET CORPORATION

R. ZOPPO CO., INC.

COEUR D'ALENE TRIBAL FARM

L. A. DREYFUS COMPANY

CMH COMPANY, INC.

BENTON FOUNDRY, INC.

MICHAEL CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.

WHIRLPOOL CORPORATION

BROWN & ROOT, POWER PLANT DIVISION

MARION POWER SHOVEL CO., INC.

ERSKINE-FRASER CO.

MORRISON-KNUDSEN AND ASSOCIATES

THE BOAM COMPANY

DIC-UNDERHILL, a Joint Venture

C. R. BURNETT AND SONS, INC.; HARLLEE FARMS

STRIPE-A-ZONE, INC.

FORTE BROTHERS, INC.

RAYBESTOS FRICTION MATERIALS COMPANY

TEXLAND DRILLING CORPORATION

THE ANACONDA COMPANY, WIRE AND CABLE DIVISION

SAM HALL & SONS, INC.

VAMPCO METAL PRODUCTS, INC.

LEONE INDUSTRIES, INC.

ASARCO, INC.

DURANT ELEVATOR, A DIVISION OF SCOULAR-BISHOP GRAIN COMPANY

PLUM CREEK LUMBER COMPANY

PLUM CREEK LUMBER COMPANY

STEARNS-ROGER, INC.

FERRO CORPORATION, (ELECTRO DIVISION)

AMERICAN PACKAGE COMPANY, INC.

BROWN & ROOT, INC., POWER PLANT DIVISION

FLEETWOOD HOMES OF TEXAS, INC.

DONALD HARRIS, INC.

A. PROKOSCH & SONS SHEET METAL, INC.; MID-HUDSON AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER COMPANY, INC.

ELECTRICAL CONSTRUCTORS OF AMERICA, INC.

DAYTON TIRE & RUBBER COMPANY (Division of the Firestone Tire & Rubber Company)

ASARCO, INC., EL PASO DIVISION; HUGHES TOOL COMPANY

NAVAJO FOREST PRODUCTS INDUSTRIES

METROPAK CONTAINERS CORPORATION

AUSTIN BUILDING COMPANY

BABCOCK AND WILCOX COMPANY

DARRAGH COMPANY

BABCOCK & WILCOX COMPANY

OTIS ELEVATOR COMPANY

R. ZOPPO COMPANY, INC.

LUTZ, DAILY & BRAIN - CONSULTING ENGINEERS

PENNSYLVANIA POWER & LIGHT CO.

HARSCO CORPORATION, d/b/a PLANT CITY STEEL COMPANY

NORTHWEST AIRLINES, INC.

INDEPENDENCE FOUNDRY & MANUFACTURING CO., INC.

GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION, INLAND DIVISION

WELDSHIP CORPORATION

S & S DIVING COMPANY

SNIDER INDUSTRIES, INC.

NATIONAL STEEL AND SHIPBUILDING COMPANY

MAXWELL WIREBOUND BOX CO., INC.

CONTINENTAL GRAIN COMPANY

MISSOURI FARMER'S ASSOCIATION, INC., MFA BOONVILLE EXCHANGE; MFA, INC., d/b/a MFA GRAIN DIVISION; DESERT GOLD FEED COMPANY

CAPITAL CITY EXCAVATING CO., INC.

GAF CORPORATION

PPG INDUSTRIES (CARIBE) a Corporation

DRUTH PACKAGING CORPORATION

SOUTHWESTERN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY

TUNNEL ELECTRIC CONSTRUCTION CO.

WEATHERBY ENGINEERING COMPANY

JOHNSON STEEL & WIRE CO., INC.

AUSTIN ROAD CO.

MAYHEW STEEL PRODUCTS, INC.

LADISH CO., TRI-CLOVER DIVISION, a Corporation

PULLMAN POWER PRODUCTS, INC.

NATIONAL ROOFING CORPORATION

OSCO INDUSTRIES, INC.

HIGHWAY MOTOR COMPANY, d/b/a PARK PRICE MOTOR COMPANY

S.J. GROVES AND SONS COMPANY

CAR AND TRUCK DOCTOR, INC.

PRESTRESSED SYSTEMS, INC.

TEXACO, INC.

GEORGIA HIGHWAY EXPRESS, INC.

RED LOBSTER INNS OF AMERICA, INC.

SUNRISE PLASTERING CORP.

STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION

H.B. ZACHRY COMPANY (INTERNATIONAL)

NATIONAL INDUSTRIAL CONSTRUCTORS, INC.

BUSHWICK COMMISSION COMPANY, INC.

CIRCLE T DRILLING CO., INC.

J.L. FOTI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC.

TEXACO, INC.

KENNETH P. THOMPSON CO., INC.

HENRY C. BECK COMPANY

HEATH & STICH, INC.

FARMERS EXPORT COMPANY

FOSTER AND KLEISER

TURNER WELDING & ERECTION CO., INC.

TRI-CITY CONSTRUCTION CO.

THE DURIRON COMPANY, INC.

SAMSON PAPER BAG CO., INC.

MEL JARVIS CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Inc.

MIDWEST STEEL ERECTION, INC.

GEISLER GANZ CORPORATION

NEW ENGLAND TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY

NATIONAL MANUFACTURING COMPANY

WALLACE ROOFING COMPANY

REYNOLDS METALS COMPANY, INC.

UNIVERSAL ROOFING AND SHEET METAL COMPANY, INC.

SUFFOLK COUNTY CONTRACTORS, INC.

NORANDA ALUMINUM, INC.

ROOFING SYSTEMS CONSULTANTS, A DIVISION OF BIT U TECH, INC.

GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY

SERVICE SPECIALTY, INC.

ECCO HIGH FREQUENCY ELECTRIC CORP.

HENRY C. BECK COMPANY

REPUBLIC ROOFING CORPORATION

OSHRC Docket No. 76-1718

Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

May 21, 1980


[*1]

Before CLEARY, Chairman; BARNAKO and COTTINE, Commissioners.

COUNSEL:

Baruch A. Fellner, Office of the Solicitor, USDOL

James E. White, Reg. Sol., USDOL

Larry E. Kelly, for the employer

OPINION:

DECISION

BY THE COMMISSION:

A decision of Administrative Law Judge Jerry W. Mitchell is before the Commission for review pursuant to section 12(j) n1 of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 29 U.S.C. � �

651-678 ("the Act").

Judge Mitchell vacated a citation alleging that Respondent, Republic Roofing Corporation, violated section 5(a)(2) of the Act n2 by permitting its employees to work near the edge of a roof without using personal fall protection equipment such as lifelines, lanyards, and safety belts. n3 Judge Mitchell held that the Secretary of Labor ("Secretary") had not met the burden of pleading and proving the feasibility of the use of personal protective equipment, citing Frank Briscoe Co., 76 OSAHRC 129/A2, 4 BNA OSHC 1729, 1976-77 CCH OSHD P21,162 (No. 7792, 1976) ("Frank Briscoe Co."). Because he vacated the citation on this basis, the judge did not address other arguments made by Respondent concerning the merits of the alleged violation.



[*2]

- - - -Footnotes- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

n1 29 U.S.C. �

661(i).

n2 29 U.S.C. �

654(a)(2).

n3 The Secretary's citation alleged that Respondent failed to comply with 29 C.F.R. �

1926.500(d)(1) in that the perimeter of the roof was not guarded with a standard railing or the equivalent.

In his complaint, the Secretary moved to amend the citation to allege that Respondent failed to comply with 29 C.F.R. �

1926.28(a) in that its employees were not protected by personal protective equipment.

Judge Mitchell granted the motion at the outset of the hearing and, in his decision, the judge rejected Respondent's continued objection to the amendment.

                                • -End Footnotes- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

The Secretary petitioned for review of the judge's decision, arguing that the judge erred in placing the burden of pleading and proving feasibility of personal protective equipment under section 1926.28(a) on the Secretary.

The Secretary also argued that if he did have to prove that personal protective equipment is feasible, he met that burden in this case.

Chairman Cleary granted the Secretary's petition for review.

Since the judge issued his decision,

[*3]

the Commission has overruled Frank Briscoe Co. to the extent it placed the burden of proving feasibility under section 1926.28(a) on the Secretary.


Thus, the judge's ruling must be set aside and reconsidered under current Commission precedent.

Accordingly, the Commission remands the case to the administrative law judge to reconsider his decision concerning the section 1926.28(a) citation.

On remand, the judge should address both the issue directed for review and, if necessary, the other arguments raised before him that were not addressed in his decision. n4 SO ORDERED.

                                  • -Footnotes- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

n4 In S & H Riggers and Erectors, Inc., supra (concurring opinion), Commissioner Barnako set forth his interpretation of 29 C.F.R. �

1926.28(a) and concluded that the Secretary has the burden of proving feasibility. He thus followed the Commission's decision in Frank Briscoe Co., supra. Commissioner Barnako continues to adhere to the position set forth by him in S & H Riggers and Erectors. However, he has previously recognized that the orderly administration of the Act requires that the Commission's administrative law judges follow precedents established by the Commission.

Gulf & Western Food Products Co., 77 OSAHRC 72/A2, 4 BNA OSHC 1436 at 1439, 1976-77 CCH OSHD P20,884 at 25,067 (Nos. 6804 & 6805, 1976).

For this reason, he joins with his colleagues in their remand order.


[*4]

                                • -End Footnotes- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read Commission precedent from 1980. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.