Ezel / Agency Decisions / 551-commission

Arlene Separates, Inc. (Commission decision, July 27, 1972)

Citation affirmed after employee-service order was ignored

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
551
Decided
July 27, 1972
Outcome
Citations affirmed
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-07-30
Official source
Read the official release (oshrc.gov)

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1972, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1972
The OSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official OSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official OSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (oshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

Arlene Separates moved to withdraw its notice of contest. The Commission ordered the company to certify that the withdrawal motion had been served on affected employees or their authorized representative, but the company did not comply. The Commission set aside its earlier order, denied withdrawal, dismissed the contest, and affirmed the citation and proposed penalty in full.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): No specific OSHA standard number is identified in the decision.
  • Outcome: The citation and proposed penalty were affirmed after the employer failed to certify employee service.
  • Key point: A withdrawal request could not proceed without proof that affected employees received required notice.

Full text (OSHRC public release)

Docket No. 551

ARLENE SEPARATES, INC.
�

OSHRC Docket No. 551

Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission

July 27, 1972

�
[*1]
�

Before MORAN, Chairman; VAN NAMEE and BURCH, Commissioners

OPINION:

�
BY THE COMMISSION: In view of respondent's failure to comply with the Commission's July 10, 1972 order requiring certification of service of the motion to withdraw notice of contest upon the affected employees or their authorized representative, it is ORDERED that the Commission's July 10, 1972 order be set aside; respondent's motion is denied, notice of contest is dismissed and the citation and notification of proposed penalty are affirmed in all respects.
�

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace