Longview Brass & Aluminum Company (Commission decision, October 31, 1973)

Case reinstated after answer located

Decision type
Commission decision
Dockets
3777, 3882
Decided
October 31, 1973
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-07-30

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 1973, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1973
The OSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official OSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official OSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (oshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

A Commission judge dismissed Longview Brass & Aluminum's notice of contest because the company appeared not to have answered the Secretary's complaint. The Commission's file showed that it had received an undated letter intended to serve as the company's answer in both docketed cases. That answer was not before the judge when he granted dismissal. The Commission directed review and reinstated the case so it could proceed.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): None identified in the official release.
  • Outcome: The dismissal for failure to answer was set aside and the case was reinstated.
  • Key point: A case could not remain dismissed for a missing answer when the Commission had timely received the employer's intended answer.

Full text (OSHRC public release)

false
false
false

EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SECRETARY
OF LABOR,

�������������������������������������������� Complainant,

������������������������ v.

OSHRC DOCKET NOS. 3777 & 3882
(consolidated)

LONGVIEW
BRASS & ALUMINUM COMPANY,

��������������������������������������������� Respondent.

Direction
for Review and Reinstatement Order

�

October 31, 1973

Before MORAN, Chairman,
VAN NAMEE and CLEARY, Commissioners

MORAN, CHAIRMAN:

On
October 1, 1973, Review Commission Judge Herbert E. Bates granted complainant�s motion dated September 10, 1973, to dismiss the respondent�s Notice of Contest for failure to answer the complaint.

Review
of that order is hereby directed.

Inspection
of the Commission�s files in this matter reveals that respondent�s undated letter, constituting an answer and received by the Commission on September 21, 1973, was intended to be effective as to two unconsolidated cases, OSAHRC Docket No. 3777 and the instant case. Said answer was not before the Administrative Law Judge in the instant case at the time he granted complainant�s motion.

In
view of the above, the Commission hereby orders reinstatement of this case.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION

SECRETARY
OF LABOR,

�������������������������������������������� Complainant,

������������������������ v.

OSHRC DOCKET NOS. 3777 & 3882
(consolidated)

LONGVIEW
BRASS & ALUMINUM COMPANY,

��������������������������������������������� Respondent.

�

September 10, 1073

BATES, JUDGE, OSAHRC:

Ruling on Secretary�s
motion to dismiss; Granted.

�

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace