Longview Brass & Aluminum Company
Case reinstated after answer located
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 1973, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
A Commission judge dismissed Longview Brass & Aluminum's notice of contest because the company appeared not to have answered the Secretary's complaint. The Commission's file showed that it had received an undated letter intended to serve as the company's answer in both docketed cases. That answer was not before the judge when he granted dismissal. The Commission directed review and reinstated the case so it could proceed.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): None identified in the official release.
- Outcome: The dismissal for failure to answer was set aside and the case was reinstated.
- Key point: A case could not remain dismissed for a missing answer when the Commission had timely received the employer's intended answer.
Full text (OSHRC public release)
false
false
false
EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
SECRETARY
OF LABOR,
��������������������������������������������
Complainant,
������������������������ v.
OSHRC DOCKET NOS. 3777 & 3882
(consolidated)
LONGVIEW
BRASS & ALUMINUM COMPANY,
���������������������������������������������
Respondent.
Direction
for Review and Reinstatement Order
�
October 31, 1973
Before MORAN, Chairman,
VAN NAMEE and CLEARY, Commissioners
MORAN, CHAIRMAN:
On
October 1, 1973, Review Commission Judge Herbert E. Bates granted complainant�s
motion dated September 10, 1973, to dismiss the respondent�s Notice of Contest
for failure to answer the complaint.
Review
of that order is hereby directed.
Inspection
of the Commission�s files in this matter reveals that respondent�s undated
letter, constituting an answer and received by the Commission on September 21,
1973, was intended to be effective as to two unconsolidated cases, OSAHRC
Docket No. 3777 and the instant case. Said answer was not before the
Administrative Law Judge in the instant case at the time he granted
complainant�s motion.
In
view of the above, the Commission hereby orders reinstatement of this case.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
SECRETARY
OF LABOR,
��������������������������������������������
Complainant,
������������������������ v.
OSHRC DOCKET NOS. 3777 & 3882
(consolidated)
LONGVIEW
BRASS & ALUMINUM COMPANY,
���������������������������������������������
Respondent.
�
September 10, 1073
BATES, JUDGE, OSAHRC:
Ruling on Secretary�s
motion to dismiss; Granted.
�
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 1973. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.