Social Security Administration and American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1923 (Authority decision, September 16, 1988)

Social Security Administration and AFGE Local 1923 (FLRA 3-CA-80254): Employee addresses ordered disclosed

Decision type
Authority decision
Docket
3-CA-80254
Decided
September 16, 1988
Outcome
Upheld
Precedential status
Citable Authority precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-04

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Authority precedent from 1988, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1988
The federal labor-relations law may have been amended, and later Authority or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FLRA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (flra.gov)

Final FLRA decision. The Authority finds that the Social Security Administration committed an unfair labor practice and orders disclosure of bargaining unit employees' names and home addresses, notice posting, and compliance reporting. An aggrieved person may seek judicial review by filing a petition in an appropriate United States court of appeals within 60 days after issuance under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a).

Plain-English summary

AFGE Local 1923 requested names and home addresses of Social Security Administration employees in its Baltimore bargaining unit to communicate about upcoming national contract negotiations. SSA refused. On stipulated facts, the Authority held that the information met the statutory disclosure requirements and that the union's possible alternative ways to reach employees did not remove SSA's duty to provide it. The Authority found violations of 5 U.S.C. § 7116(a)(1), (5), and (8). It ordered SSA to furnish the information, post a notice for 60 days, and report compliance.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Information duty under 5 U.S.C. § 7114(b)(4) and unfair labor practices under 5 U.S.C. § 7116(a).
  • Outcome: Unfair labor practice found; disclosure, notice, and compliance report ordered.
  • Key point: The Authority applied its rule requiring employee names and home addresses for the exclusive representative.

Full text (FLRA public release)

[ v32 p1195 ]
32:1195(158)CA

The decision of the Authority follows:

32 FLRA No. 158

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

BEFORE THE

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

Respondent

and

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT

EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1923, AFL-CIO

Charging Party

Case No. 3-CA-80254

DECISION AND ORDER

I. Statement of the Case

This unfair labor practice case is before the Authority in accordance with section 2429.1(a) of the Authority's Rules and Regulations, based on a stipulation of facts by the parties, who have agreed that no material issue of fact exists.(*)

The complaint alleges that the Respondent violated section 7116(a)(1), (5), and (8) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute) by failing and refusing to provide the American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1923, AFL-CIO (the Union) with the names and home addresses of bargaining unit employees located at the Respondent's Baltimore, Maryland office. For the reasons stated below, we find that the Respondent committed the unfair labor practice as alleged.

II. Facts

The American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1923, AFL-CIO is the exclusive representative of a unit of employees at the Respondent's Baltimore, Maryland location. By letter dated February 2, 1988, the Union requested that the Respondent furnish it with the names and home addresses of "all AFGE Local 1923 bargaining unit employees[.]" The Union stated in its letter that because bargaining on a National Agreement was about to begin, "[i]t is therefore imperative that we be able to communicate with all our bargaining unit employees and to get their input into this process." By letter dated February 4, 1988, the Respondent refused to provide the Union with the information requested.

The parties stipulated that the names and home addresses of unit employees are normally maintained by the Respondent in the regular course of business, are reasonably available, and do not constitute guidance, advice, counsel, or training for management officials or supervisors relating to collective bargaining.

III. Positions of the Parties

The General Counsel argues that the Authority's decision on remand in Farmers Home Administration Finance Office, St. Louis, Missouri, 23 FLRA 788 (1986), enforced in part and remanded sub nom. U.S. Department of Agriculture and Farmers Home Administration Finance Office, St. Louis, Missouri v. FLRA, 836 F.2d 1139 (8th Cir. 1988), petition for cert. filed, U.S.L.W. (U.S. Aug. 26, 1988) (No. 88-349), in which the Authority concluded that section 7114(b)(4) of the Statute entitled the exclusive representative to the names and home addresses of employees in the bargaining unit, is dispositive of the issue in the case. The General Counsel contends that the Respondent's admitted failure to furnish the employees' names and home addresses constitutes a clear violation of section 7116(a)(1), (5), and (8) of the Statute.

The Respondent did not file a brief. However, in its "Motion to Void Stipulation and Remand Case," the Respondent requests the Authority to construe the stipulation "as preserving [R]espondent's contention that resolution of various issues requires analysis of evidence of alternative means of communications available to the [U]nion." Motion at 11 (footnote omitted). The Respondent identifies these issues as "whether the home address information is 'necessary' within the meaning of [s]ection 7114(b)(4), whether the operation of the normal Exemption 6 balancing test requires disclosure, and whether the information is 'necessary' within the meaning of the purportedly applicable routine use." Id. at n.2.

IV. Analysis and Conclusion

In the Authority's Decision and Order on Remand in Farmers Home, the Authority concluded that the release of the names and home addresses of bargaining unit employees to their exclusive representatives is not prohibited by law, is necessary for unions to fulfill their duties under the Statute, and meets all of the other requirements established by section 7114(b)(4) of the Statute. The Authority also determined that the release of the information is generally required without regard to whether alternative means of communication are available. Further, from the parties' stipulation, it is evident that the other requirements of section 7114(b)(4)(A), (B), and (C) have been met in this case.

Based on the parties' stipulation and the Authority's decision on remand in Farmers Home, we find that the Respondent was required to furnish the Union with the names and home addresses of employees in the bargaining unit. The Respondent's refusal to do so violated section 7116(a)(1), (5), and (8) of the Statute. See also United States Department of the Navy and Philadelphia Naval Shipyard v. FLRA, 840 F.2d 1131 (3d Cir. 1988), petition for cert. filed, U.S.L.W. (U.S. Aug. 26, 1988) (No. 88-356), enforcing Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, 24 FLRA 37 (1986); U.S. Department of the Air Force, Scott Air Force Base, Illinois v. FLRA, 838 F.2d 229 (7th Cir. 1988), petition for cert. filed, U.S.L.W. (U.S. Aug. 26, 1988) (No. 88-354), affirming Department of the Air Force, Scott Air Force Base, Illinois, 24 FLRA 226 (1986); Department of Health and Human Services, Social Security Administration v. FLRA, 833 F.2d 1129 (4th Cir. 1987), petition for cert. filed, U.S.L.W. (U.S. Aug. 26, 1988) (No. 88-355), affirming Department of Health and Human Services, Social Security Administration, 24 FLRA 543 (1986); Department of Health and Human Services, Social Security Administration and Social Security Administration Field Operations, New York Region, 24 FLRA 583 (1986); Department of Health and Human Services, Social Security Administration, 24 FLRA 600 (1986).

ORDER

Pursuant to section 2423.29 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations and section 7118 of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute, the Social Security Administration shall:

  1. Cease and desist from:

(a) Refusing to furnish, upon request of the American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1923, AFL-CIO, the exclusive representative of certain of its employees, the names and home addresses of all employees in the bargaining unit it represents at its Baltimore, Maryland location.

(b) In any like or related manner, interfering with, restraining, or coercing their employees in the exercise of the rights assured them by the Statute.

  1. Take the following affirmative action in order to
    effectuate the purposes and policies of the Statute:

(a) Furnish the American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1923, AFL-CIO with the names and home addresses of all employees in the bargaining unit it represents at its Baltimore, Maryland location.

(b) Post at its facilities in Baltimore, Maryland where bargaining unit employees represented by the American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1923, AFL-CIO are located, copies of the attached Notice on forms to be furnished by the Federal Labor Relations Authority. Upon receipt of such forms, they shall be signed by the Commissioner of Social Security, Baltimore, Maryland and shall be posted in conspicuous places, including all bulletin boards and other places where notices to employees are customarily posted, and shall be maintained for 60 consecutive days thereafter. Reasonable steps shall be taken to ensure that such notices are not altered, defaced, or covered by any other material.

(c) Pursuant to section 2423.30 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations, notify the Regional Director, Region III, Federal Labor Relations Authority, in writing, within 30 days from the date of this Order as to what steps have been taken to comply.

Issued, Washington, D.C.,

________
Jerry L. Calhoun, Chairman

Jean McKee, Member
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY

NOTICE TO ALL EMPLOYEES

AS ORDERED BY THE FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS
AUTHORITY

AND TO EFFECTUATE THE POLICIES OF
THE

FEDERAL SERVICE LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS
STATUTE

WE NOTIFY OUR EMPLOYEES THAT:

WE WILL NOT refuse to furnish, upon request of the American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1923, AFL-CIO, the exclusive representative of certain of our employees, the names and home addresses of all employees in the bargaining unit it represents at our Baltimore, Maryland location.

WE WILL NOT, in any like or related manner, interfere with, restrain, or coerce our employees in the exercise of the rights assured them by the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute.

WE WILL furnish the American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1923, AFL-CIO with the names and home addresses of all employees in the bargaining unit it represents at our Baltimore, Maryland location.

______
(Activity)

Dated:___
By:______

(Signature) (Title)

This Notice must remain posted for 60 consecutive days from the date of posting, and must not be altered, defaced, or covered by any other material.

If employees have any questions concerning this Notice or compliance with its provisions, they may communicate directly with the Regional Director, Region III, Federal Labor Relations Authority, whose address is: 1111 18th Street, N.W., 7th Floor, P.O. Box 33758, Washington, D.C. 20033-0758 and whose telephone number is: (202) 653-8500.

FOOTNOTES:
(If blank, the decision does not
have footnotes.)

*/ The Respondent requested that the
Authority void the stipulation on the basis that the Respondent's representative who signed the stipulation had no authority to do so. By order dated August 2, 1988, we denied the Respondent's motion.

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace