R.G. and Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Homeland Security Investigations (Board decision, January 14, 2026)
Board returns schedule award for combined claim review (ECAB 26-0017)
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 2026, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
ECAB remand decision. The Board set aside OWCP’s September 22, 2025 schedule award decision and remanded for combined review of related files; the proper award remains unresolved. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a). FECA compensation decisions are generally not subject to court review under 5 U.S.C. § 8128(b).
Plain-English summary
An ICE worker received a schedule award for two percent impairment of each lower extremity. Several earlier accepted back and leg injury files had not been combined with the current file. The Board directed OWCP to combine them and decide the award using the full record.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: Federal Employees’ Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c), 501.3.
- Outcome: Schedule award decision set aside and remanded for combined file review.
- Key point: Related back and lower extremity files had to be considered together.
Full text (ECAB public release)
United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
________
)
R.G., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 26-0017
)
Issued: January 14, 2026
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, )
U.S. IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS
)
ENFORCEMENT, HOMELAND SECURITY
)
INVESTIGATIONS, Harlingen, TX, Employer )
__________ )
Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director
ORDER REMANDING CASE
Before:
ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge
PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge
On October 9, 2025 appellant filed a timely appeal from a September 22, 2025 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards docketed the appeal as No. 26-0017.1
On November 8, 2024 appellant, then a 52-year-old general inspection, investigation, and compliance officer, filed a traumatic injury claim (Form CA-1) alleging that on November 7, 2024 she injured her lower back and legs when she carried a large chest full of ice and bottled drinks
1
The Board notes that, following the September 22, 2025 decision, OWCP received additional evidence. However, the Board’s Rules of Procedure provides: “The Board’s review of a case is limited to the evidence in the case record that was before OWCP at the time of its final decision. Evidence not before OWCP will not be considered by the Board for the first time on appeal.” 20 C.F.R. § 501.2(c)(1). Thus, the Board is precluded from reviewing this additional evidence for the first time on appeal. Id. weighing 60 to 80 pounds while in the performance of duty. 2 She did not stop work. OWCP accepted the claim for lumbar intervertebral disc displacement and lumbar radiculopathy.
On June 2, 2025 appellant filed a claim for compensation (Form CA-7) requesting a schedule award.
By decision dated September 22, 2025, OWCP granted appellant a schedule award for two percent permanent impairment of the right lower extremity and two percent permanent impairment of the left lower extremity.
The Board, having duly considered this matter, finds that the case is not in posture for decision.
OWCP’s procedures provide that cases should be administratively combined when correct adjudication of the issues depends on frequent cross-referencing between files, including when similar conditions are claimed in such cases.3 This allows OWCP to consider all relevant claim files in developing a given claim.4 Appellant’s claims under OWCP File Nos. xxxxxx298, xxxxxx073, and xxxxxx705 also involved the lower back and lower extremities, and should therefore be administratively combined with the present claim, OWCP File No. xxxxxx995 for a full and fair adjudication.5 This will allow OWCP to consider all relevant reports and accompanying evidence in developing appellant’s schedule award claim.6
The Board shall, therefore, remand the case for OWCP to administratively combine OWCP File Nos. xxxxxx995, xxxxxx298, xxxxxx073, and xxxxxx705. Following this and other such further development as deemed necessary, OWCP shall issue a de novo decision. Accordingly,
2
OWCP assigned the present claim OWCP File No. xxxxxx995. Appellant previously filed CA-1 forms for: an April 26, 2007 injury, which OWCP accepted for lumbosacral radiculitis under OWCP File No. xxxxxx298; a November 22, 2011 injury, which OWCP accepted for displacement of lumbar intervertebral disc without myelopathy and thoracic or lumbosacral neuritis or radiculitis under OWCP File No. xxxxxx073; and a June 2, 2016 injury which OWCP accepted for lumbar sprain under OWCP File No. xxxxxx705. Appellant’s claims have not been administratively combined by OWCP. 3 Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 2 -- Claims, File Maintenance and Management, Chapter 2.400.8c (February 2000).
4
Id.
5
See Order Remanding Case, C.B., Docket No. 25-0603 (issued July 3, 2025); Order Remanding Case, J.L., Docket No. 24-0785 (issued November 1, 2024); Order Remanding Case, M.T., Docket No. 24-0753 (issued September 23, 2024); Order Remanding Case, K.W., Docket No. 22-1258 (issued March 14, 2023). 6 Id. See also K.G., Docket No. 21-0068 (issued July 29, 2022); D.J., Docket No. 20-0997 (issued November 20, 2020); S.D., Docket No. 19-0590 (issued August 28, 2020).
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the September 22, 2025 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs is set aside, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order of the Board.
Issued: January 14, 2026
Washington, DC
Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
3
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace