C.B. and Department of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons (Board decision, July 3, 2025)

Board returns prison worker's schedule award for combined back files (ECAB 25-0603)

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
25-0603
Decided
July 3, 2025
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-07

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2025, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB remand decision. The Board set aside OWCP's May 16, 2025 schedule award decision and ordered three related back injury files combined; additional award entitlement remains unresolved. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a). FECA compensation decisions are generally not subject to court review under 5 U.S.C. § 8128(b).

Plain-English summary

A federal prison worker sought review of a schedule award while three overlapping lower back claims sat in separate files. The Board found the files needed to be combined so OWCP could consider all relevant medical evidence. It returned the award question for a new decision.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Federal Employees' Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c), 501.3.
  • Outcome: Schedule award decision set aside and remanded for combined file review.
  • Key point: Overlapping back injury claims needed a single record for a fair award decision.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
C.B., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 25-0603
)
Issued: July 3, 2025
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL
)
BUREAU OF PRISONS, FEDERAL
)
CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, DANBURY, )
Danbury, CT, Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER REMANDING CASE

Before:
ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge
JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge
VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On May 31, 2025 appellant filed a timely appeal from a May 16, 2025 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP).1 The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned the appeal Docket No. 25-0603.2

On March 16, 2023 appellant, then a 31-year-old correctional officer, filed a traumatic injury claim (Form CA-1) alleging that on March 15, 2023 he injured his lower back, hips, legs and right shoulder, elbow, and wrist when he fell onto his back during self -defense training while

1
The Board notes that appellant also presented arguments on his AB-1 form regarding attorney’s fees. As there is no decision regarding attorney’s fees over which the Board currently has jurisdiction, these arguments will not be addressed. See 20 C.F.R. § 501.2(c). 2 The Board notes that, following the May 16, 2025 decision, OWCP received additional evidence. However, the Board’s Rules of Procedure provides: “The Board’s review of a case is limited to the evidence in the case record that was before OWCP at the time of its final decision. Evidence not before OWCP will not be considered by the Board for the first time on appeal.” 20 C.F.R. § 501.2(c)(1). Thus, the Board is precluded from reviewing this additional evidence for the first time on appeal. Id. in the performance of duty. 3 He did not stop work. OWCP accepted the claim for degenerative disc disease of the lumbar spine, sciatica, lumbar herniated discs at L4 -L5 and L5-S1, and traumatically-induced right elbow lateral epicondylitis.

On November 16, 2024 appellant filed a claim for compensation (Form CA-7) requesting a schedule award.

By decision dated May 16, 2025, OWCP granted appellant a schedule award for “17 percent” permanent impairment. 4

The Board, having duly considered this matter, finds that the case is not in posture for decision.

OWCP’s procedures provide that cases should be administratively combined when correct adjudication of the issues depends on frequent cross-referencing between files, including when similar conditions are claimed in such cases.5 This allows OWCP to consider all relevant claim files in developing a given claim.6 Appellant’s claims under OWCP File Nos. xxxxxx375, xxxxxx846, and xxxxxx613 all involve the lower back, and should therefore be administratively combined for a full and fair adjudication.7 This will allow OWCP to consider all relevant reports and accompanying evidence in developing appellant’s schedule award claim.8

The Board shall, therefore, remand the case for OWCP to administratively combine OWCP File Nos. xxxxxx375, xxxxxx846, and xxxxxx613. Following this and other such further development as deemed necessary, OWCP shall issue a de novo decision. Accordingly,

3
OWCP assigned the present claim OWCP File No. xxxxxx375. Appellant previously filed a Form CA-1 for an April 24, 2021 low back injury, which OWCP processed as a short form closure under OWCP File No. xxxxxx846. He also previously filed a Form CA-1 for a May 10, 2022 low back injury with left-sided sciatica, which OWCP denied under OWCP File No. xxxxxx613. The claims have not been administratively combined by OWCP. 4 In its May 16, 2025 decision, OWCP did not specify the accepted condition or conditions for which it was granting a schedule award. In an automated compensation payment system record of even date, it noted it was paying schedule award compensation for 10 percent permanent impairment of the right arm and seven percent permanent impairment of the left leg. 5 Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 2 -- Claims, File Maintenance and Management, Chapter 2.400.8c (February 2000).
6
Id.
7
See Order Remanding Case, J.L., Docket No. 24-0785 (issued November 1, 2024); Order Remanding Case, M.T., Docket No. 24-0753 (issued September 23, 2024); Order Remanding Case, K.W., Docket No. 22-1258 (issued March 14, 2023). 8 Id. See also K.G., Docket No. 21-0068 (issued July 29, 2022); D.J., Docket No. 20-0997 (issued November 20, 2020); S.D., Docket No. 19-0590 (issued August 28, 2020).

2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the May 16, 2025 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs is set aside, and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order of the Board.

Issued: July 3, 2025
Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace