J.L. and Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Heber Ranger District (Board decision, September 25, 2025)

Board returns Forest Service travel claims for missing records (ECAB 25-0133)

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
25-0133
Decided
September 25, 2025
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-07

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2025, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB remand decision. The Board set aside two October 29, 2024 travel reimbursement decisions and ordered reconstruction of the case record and new OWCP decisions; reimbursement remains unresolved. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a). FECA compensation decisions are generally not subject to court review under 5 U.S.C. § 8128(b).

Plain-English summary

A Forest Service employee appealed decisions that denied some travel reimbursement requests. The Board had ordered OWCP to send the complete claim record, but forms for some disputed travel dates were still missing. Because it could not review the requests on an incomplete record, the Board remanded for reconstruction of the file and new decisions.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Federal Employees' Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c), 501.3.
  • Outcome: Travel reimbursement decisions set aside and remanded for a complete record and fresh decisions.
  • Key point: Missing travel claim forms prevented informed appellate review.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
J.L., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 25-0133
)
Issued: September 25, 2025
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE, FOREST )
SERVICE, HEBER RANGER DISTRICT,
)
Overgaard, AZ, Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER REMANDING CASE

Before:
PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge
VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On November 18, 2024 appellant filed a timely appeal from two October 29, 2024 merit decisions of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards docketed the appeal as No. 25-0133.

The Clerk of the Appellate Boards then served the Director of OWCP with a copy of appellant’s appeal and requested that OWCP transmit the case record to the Board in accordance with the Board’s Rules of Procedure.1 OWCP subsequently forwarded the case record to the Board.

By decision dated October 29, 2024, OWCP approved appellant’s claim for reimbursement of travel expenses for May 3, 2022, noting that it had received a medical treatment note for this date. However, it denied his claim for reimbursement of travel expenses for April 6 and May 4,

1
20 C.F.R. § 501.4. On October 26, 1989 appellant, then a 34-year-old forestry technician, filed a traumatic injury claim (Form CA-l) alleging that on October 25, 1989 he twisted his lower back when jumping out of the way of a falling tree while in the performance of duty. OWCP accepted his claim for low back strain, unspecified anxiety state, other intervertebral disc degeneration of the lumbar region, and rad iculopathy of the lumbar region. 2022, finding that it had not received documentation that he underwent treatment for a work- related condition on these dates.

By separate decision also dated October 29, 2024, OWCP approved appellant’s claim for reimbursement of travel expenses, in part, for December 2, 2021, and January 6, March 8 and 9, and April 5, 2022, noting that it had received medical treatment notes for these dates. However, it denied his claim for reimbursement of travel expenses for December 1, 2021, finding that it had not received documentation that he underwent treatment for a work-related condition on this date. In addition, OWCP noted that it denied appellant’s claim for reimbursement of travel expenses, in part, for March 9, 2022.

The case record initially transmitted to the Board did not include any medical travel refund request (Form OWCP-957) claims. Appellant appealed the October 29, 2024 decisions to the Board and, by order dated February 24, 2025,2 the Board directed OWCP to produce the complete case record within 30 days, including any Form OWCP-957 claims filed by appellant.

On March 4, 2025 OWCP received a Form OWCP-957, dated June 8, 2022, wherein appellant requested reimbursement of travel expenses for November 8 and 13, and December 13, 2021. It also received additional OWCP-957 forms dated June 8, 2022, wherein he requested reimbursement of travel expenses for December 22, 2021, and January 12 and 17, February 10 and 12, April 6 and 9, May 3, 4, and 31, and June 8, 2022.

The Board, having duly considered this matter, however, finds that the case is not in posture for decision. While some OWCP-957 forms were added, the case record transmitted to the Board does not include all of appellant’s Form OWCP-957 claims as requested by the Board in its February 24, 2025 order. For example, the Form OWCP-957 claims for reimbursement of travel expenses for December 1, 2021, and March 9, 2022 are not found in the case record.

Section 501.2(c) of the Board’s Rules of Procedure 3 provides that the Board has jurisdiction to consider and decide appeals from the final decision of OWCP in any case arising under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.4 Because the record as transmitted to the Board is incomplete and would not permit an informed adjudication of the case, 5 the Board is unable to properly consider and decide appellant’s claim. The case, therefore, is remanded to OWCP for reconstruction and proper assemblage of the record. 6 After this and such further development as deemed necessary, OWCP shall issue a de novo decision.

2
Order to Complete Record Within 30 Days, Docket No. 25-0133 (issued February 24, 2025).
3
20 C.F.R. § 501.2(c).
4
5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.
5
See Order Remanding Case, J.C., Docket No. 21-1402 (issued January 11, 2023); Order Remanding Case, G.B., Docket No. 20-0236 (issued October 9, 2020); H.C., Docket No. 19-1976 (issued May 26, 2020); Order Remanding Case, D.H., Docket No. 17-0224 (issued August 16, 2018). 6 Id.

2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the October 29, 2024 decisions of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs are set aside and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order of the Board.

Issued: September 25, 2025
Washington, DC

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace