T.J. and U.S. Postal Service, City of Industry Processing and Distribution Center (Board decision, November 6, 2024)

Board dismisses untimely appeal (ECAB 25-0014)

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
25-0014
Decided
November 6, 2024
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-07

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2024, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB final decision. The Board dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a). FECA compensation decisions are generally not subject to court review under 5 U.S.C. § 8128(b).

Plain-English summary

A postal employee appealed a July 2023 OWCP decision in October 2024. The Board found that the appeal came after its 180-day filing deadline and that no supported compelling circumstances justified the delay. It dismissed the appeal without reaching the claim's merits.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Federal Employees' Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.
  • Outcome: Appeal dismissed as untimely.
  • Key point: An appeal filed after the Board's 180-day deadline is outside its ordinary jurisdiction.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
T.J., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 25-0014
)
Issued: November 6, 2024
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, CITY OF INDUSTRY )
PROCESSING & DISTRIBUTION CENTER, )
City of Industry, CA, Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:
ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge
PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On October 10, 2024 appellant filed an appeal from a July 20, 2023 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned the appeal Docket No. 25-0014.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act. 1 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of OWCP’s decision.2

The 180 th day following the July 20, 2023 decision was January 16, 2024. As appellant did not file an appeal with the Board until October 10, 2024, more than 180 days after the July 20, 2023 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 25-0014 is untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not explained the failure to 1 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).
2
20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of a decision of the OWCP.” timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed as No. 25-0014 must be dismissed.3 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 25-0014 is dismissed.

Issued: November 6, 2024
Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3
The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id. at § 501.6(d).

2

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace