L.M. and U.S. Postal Service, Beechnut Post Office (Board decision, June 3, 2024)
Board combines related neck and back claim files (ECAB 24-0398)
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 2024, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
ECAB remand decision. The Board set aside OWCP’s disability decision and remanded for a combined review of related injury files; wage-loss entitlement remains unresolved. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a). FECA compensation decisions are generally not subject to court review under 5 U.S.C. § 8128(b).
Plain-English summary
A Houston postal carrier sought wage-loss compensation after a neck and upper back injury. She also had an earlier accepted claim involving similar neck and thoracic spine conditions. The Board found the two files had to be combined before OWCP could fairly decide disability for the claimed period. It returned the case for a joint record and new decision.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: Federal Employees’ Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.
- Outcome: Disability denial set aside; related injury files to be combined.
- Key point: Overlapping accepted spine injuries required a combined record.
Full text (ECAB public release)
United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
________
)
L.M., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 24-0398
)
Issued: June 3, 2024
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, BEECHNUT POST )
OFFICE, Houston, TX, Employer
)
__________ )
Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director
ORDER REMANDING CASE
Before:
ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge
PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge
On March 5, 2024 appellant filed a timely appeal from a February 1, 2024 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned the appeal Docket No. 24-0398.
On March 29, 2022 appellant, then a 43-year-old carrier technician, filed a traumatic injury claim (Form CA-1) alleging that on March 23, 2022 she injured her neck, shoulders, and upper back when carrying mail and delivering mail while in the performance of duty. OWCP assigned the claim OWCP File No. xxxxxx012, and on May 12, 2022, accepted it for sprain of ligaments of thoracic spine, and sprain of joints and ligaments of other parts of the neck. Appellant stopped work on March 23, 2022.1
Appellant, thereafter, filed a claim for compensation (Form CA-7) for disability from work commencing June 18, 2022. In support of her claim, she submitted medical evidence from her
1
Appellant also has a prior traumatic injury claim, which OWCP accepted for sprain of the ligaments of the lumbar spine, sprain of the ligaments of the thoracic spine, sprain of the joints and ligaments of other parts of the neck and an unspecified sprain of the left foot, under OWCP File No. xxxxxx616. Appellant’s claims have not been administratively combined. treating physicians, opining that she was disabled from work for intermittent periods due to the accepted March 23, 2022 employment injury.
By decision dated February 8, 2023, OWCP denied appellant’s claim for disability from work commencing June 18, 2022, finding that the medical evidence of record was insufficient to establish disability from work commencing June 18, 2022 due to the accepted March 23, 2022 employment injury.
OWCP received additional medical reports addressing the claimed period of disability from work.
On January 25, 2024 appellant requested reconsideration.
By decision dated February 1, 2024, OWCP denied modification of the February 8, 2023 decision.
The Board, having duly considered this matter, finds that the case is not in posture for decision.
OWCP’s procedures provide that cases should be administratively combined when correct adjudication of the issues depends on frequent cross-referencing between files. 2 For example, if a new injury case is reported for an employee who previously filed an injury claim for a similar condition or the same part of the body, doubling is required. 3 Herein, appellant has previously accepted sprain of joints and ligaments of other parts of neck, and sprain of ligaments of thoracic spine, sustained on August 26, 2020 while in the performance of duty, under OWCP File No. xxxxxx616. Therefore, for a full and fair adjudication, the case shall be returned to OWCP to administratively combine OWCP File No. xxxxxx616 with OWCP File No. xxxxxx012. Following any further development deemed necessary, OWCP shall issue a de novo decision. Accordingly,
2
Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 2 -- Claims, File Maintenance and Management, Chapter 2.400.8c (February 2000).
3
Id.; Order Remanding Case, E.E., Docket No. 23-0677 (issued February 27, 2024); Order Remanding Case, B.B., Docket No. 23-1015 (issued January 30, 2024).
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the February 1, 2024 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs is set aside and the case is remanded to OWCP for further proceedings consistent with this order of the Board.
Issued: June 3, 2024
Washington, DC
Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
Janice B. Askin, Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
3
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace