C.S. and U.S. Postal Service, Little Rock Processing and Distribution Center (Board decision, March 5, 2024)

Board dismisses appeal from proposed benefit termination (ECAB 24-0177)

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
24-0177
Decided
March 5, 2024
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-07

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2024, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB final decision. The Board dismissed the appeal because OWCP had issued only a proposed termination, not a final adverse decision. The proposal remains pending before OWCP. The Board order is final upon expiration of 30 days from issuance under 20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d); a party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days unless the order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a).

Plain-English summary

A postal employee appealed OWCP’s notice proposing to terminate wage-loss and medical benefits. The Board held that the notice was a proposal, not a final adverse decision. It dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction without deciding whether benefits should end.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.
  • Outcome: Appeal dismissed for lack of a final OWCP decision.
  • Key point: A proposed termination cannot be appealed to the Board before OWCP issues a final decision.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
C.S., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 24-0177
) Issued: March 5, 2024
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, LITTLE ROCK
)
PROCESSING & DISTRIBUTION CENTER,
)
Little Rock, AR, Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:
ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge
VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On December 14, 2023 appellant filed an appeal from a November 9, 2023 notice of proposed termination by the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned the appeal Docket No. 24-0177.

The Board, having duly considered the matter, notes that its jurisdiction is limited to the review of final adverse OWCP decisions issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.1 This jurisdiction encompasses any final adverse decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of the date appellant filed her appeal.2

On November 9, 2023 OWCP proposed to terminate appellant’s wage-loss compensation and medical benefits because the medical evidence established that she no longer had disability or residuals causally related to the accepted September 3, 2022 employment injury. It afforded her 30 days to submit additional evidence or argument challenging the proposed termination. The November 9, 2023 notice, therefore, does not constitute a final adverse decision regarding 1 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3.
2
20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of a decision of the OWCP.” termination of appellant’s wage-loss compensation and medical benefits. Section 501.2(c)(2) of the Board’s Rules of Procedure provides: “There will be no appeal with respect to any interlocutory matter decided (or not decided) by OWCP during the pendency of a case.”3

As there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP over which the Board may properly exercise jurisdiction, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed as No. 24-0177 must be dismissed.4 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 24-0177 is dismissed.

Issued: March 5, 2024
Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3
Id. at § 501.2(c)(2).
4
The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” 20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d).

2

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace