S.P. and Department of Homeland Security, Transportation Security Administration (Board decision, February 28, 2024)

Board dismisses appeal from proposed wage-capacity change (ECAB 24-0099)

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
24-0099
Decided
February 28, 2024
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-07

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2024, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB final decision. The Board dismissed the appeal without deciding the underlying compensation claim. Its order is final upon expiration of 30 days from issuance under 20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d). A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days unless this order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a).

Plain-English summary

A TSA employee appealed OWCP’s notice proposing to modify a prior wage-capacity determination. The Board held that the notice was only a proposal and not a final adverse decision. It dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction without deciding the wage-capacity issue.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.
  • Outcome: Appeal dismissed because OWCP had issued only a proposal.
  • Key point: A proposed modification was not yet appealable to the Board.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
S.P., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 24-0099
)
Issued: February 28, 2024
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, )
TRANSPORTATION SECURITY
)
ADMINISTRATION, Houston, TX, Employer )
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Linda Humphrey, for the appellant1
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:
PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On November 15, 2023 appellant, through her representative, sought an appeal from a October 26, 2023 notice of proposed modification of loss of wage-earning capacity (LWEC) determination by the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned the appeal Docket No. 24-0099.

The Board, having duly considered this matter, notes that it has jurisdiction to review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act. 2 This

1
In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no claim for a fee for legal or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e). No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the Board. Id. An attorney or representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s approval may constitute a misdemeanor, subject to fine or imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also 18 U.S.C. § 292. Demands for payment of fees to a representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for investigation. 2 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a). jurisdiction encompasses any final adverse decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of the date appellant filed the appeal. 3

On October 26, 2023, OWCP proposed to modify appellant’s LWEC determination issued on April 21, 2020. It afforded appellant 30 days to submit evidence and argument challenging the proposed modification. The October 26, 2023 notice, therefore does not constitute a final adverse decision regarding modification of appellant’s LWEC determination. Section 501.2(c)(2) of the Board’s Rules of Procedure provides: “There will be no appeal with respect to any interlocutory matter decided (or not decided) by OWCP during the pendency of a case. ”4

As there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP over which the Board may properly exercise jurisdiction, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed as Docket No. 2 4-0099 must be dismissed. 5 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as Docket No. 24-0099 is dismissed.

Issued: February 28, 2024
Washington, DC

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3
20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e), which provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of a decision of OWCP.” 4
Id. at § 501.2(c)(2).
5
The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” 20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d).

2

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace