W.S. and Department of Homeland Security, Federal Protective Service (Board decision, November 30, 2023)
Federal Protective Service employee's late appeal dismissed (ECAB 24-0063)
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 2023, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
ECAB final decision dismissing appeal. The Board dismissed the appeal as untimely and did not reach the compensation merits. Under 20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d), this order becomes final 30 days after issuance. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days unless this order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a).
Plain-English summary
A Federal Protective Service employee appealed a May 19, 2016 OWCP decision on October 31, 2023. The Board found that the 180-day appeal deadline had passed on November 15, 2016. The employee did not explain the delay with supporting documentation sufficient to establish compelling circumstances. The Board dismissed the appeal as untimely and did not consider the compensation merits.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.3(e), 501.6(d), 501.7(a).
- Outcome: Appeal dismissed as untimely.
- Key point: An appeal filed years after the 180-day deadline cannot be reviewed without supported compelling circumstances for an extension.
Full text (ECAB public release)
United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
________
)
W.S., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 24-0063
) Issued: November 30, 2023
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
)
FEDERAL PROTECTIVE SERVICE,
)
Alexandria, VA, Employer
)
__________ )
Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Before:
PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge
On October 31, 2023 appellant filed an appeal from a May 19, 2016 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned the appeal Docket No. 24-0063.
The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.1 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of OWCP’s decision. 2
The 180 th day following the May 19, 2016 decision was November 15, 2016. As appellant did not file an appeal with the Board until October 31, 2023, more than 180 days after the May 19, 2016 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 24-0063 is 1 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).
2
20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of a decision of the OWCP.” untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not explained his failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed as No. 24-0063, must be dismissed. 3 Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 24-0063 is dismissed.
Issued: November 30, 2023
Washington, DC
Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
3
The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id. at § 501.6(d).
2
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace