V.M. and U.S. Postal Service, Shreveport Annex (Board decision, February 22, 2024)

Board orders two elbow claim files combined (ECAB 24-0018)

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
24-0018
Decided
February 22, 2024
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-07

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2024, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB remand decision. The Board set aside two OWCP decisions and ordered the related elbow files combined. The underlying claim remains unresolved. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a).

Plain-English summary

A postal employee reported continuing right elbow problems after an earlier accepted injury. OWCP treated her report as a new occupational disease claim, denied it, and later denied her hearing request. The Board found that OWCP needed to combine the earlier and current elbow files for a full review. It set aside both decisions and directed OWCP to issue a new decision after combining the records.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.
  • Outcome: Disease claim and hearing decisions set aside and remanded.
  • Key point: Related injury files had to be combined before adjudication.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
V.M., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 24-0018
)
Issued: February 22, 2024
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, SHREVEPORT
)
ANNEX, Shreveport, LA, Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER REMANDING CASE

Before:
PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On October 9, 2023 appellant filed a timely appeal from a June 21, 2023 merit decision and an August 2, 2023 nonmerit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned the appeal Docket No. 24-0018.

On April 5, 2023 appellant, then a 41-year-old postal employee, filed a notice of recurrence (Form CA-2a) alleging that an original injury of December 2, 2021 had recurred, noting that her elbow had never healed after that injury and that her continued use of her elbow had worsened its condition.1 By letter dated April 17, 2023, OWCP informed her that based on her description of the circumstances on the Form CA-2a, a new case had been created for an occupational disease under OWCP File No. xxxxxx991.

By decision dated June 21, 2023, OWCP denied appellant’s occupational disease claim, finding that the evidence of record was insufficient to establish medial epicondylitis, ulnar neuropathy, and traumatic tear of the ulnar collateral ligament of the right elbow as work related.

1
Appellant previously filed an occupational disease claim (Form CA-2) which OWCP accepted for an elbow contusion under OWCP File No. xxxxxx138.
On July 24, 2023 OWCP received appellant’s July 18, 2023 request for an oral hearing before a representative of OWCP’s Branch of Hearings and Review.

By decision dated August 2, 2023, OWCP denied appellant’s request for an oral hearing as untimely filed, because it was received more than 30 days after its June 21, 2023 merit decision. It further found that the issue in this case could equally well be addressed by requesting reconsideration and submitting evidence not previously considered.

The Board, having duly considered this matter, finds that the case is not in posture for decision.

OWCP’s procedures provide that cases should be administratively combined when correct adjudication depends on cross-referencing between files and where two or more injuries occur to the same part of the body. 2 In the present claim, appellant initially claimed a recurrence of a right elbow condition, under OWCP File No. xxxxxx138. Therefore, for a full and fair adjudication, the case shall be remanded for OWCP to administratively combine OWCP File Nos. xxxxxx138 and xxxxxx991. Following this and other such further development as deemed necessary, OWCP shall issue a de novo decision. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the June 21 and August 2, 2023 decisions of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs are set aside and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order of the Board.

Issued: February 22, 2024
Washington, DC

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

2
Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 2 -- Claims, File Maintenance and Management, Chapter 2.400.8c (February 2000).

2

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace