K.F. and Department of Veterans Affairs, Charlie Norwood VA Medical Center (Board decision, February 13, 2024)

Board orders related anxiety claims combined (ECAB 23-1138)

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
23-1138
Decided
February 13, 2024
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-07

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2024, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB remand decision. The Board set aside the claim decision and ordered the three anxiety files combined. The underlying claim remains unresolved. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a).

Plain-English summary

A VA secretary sought compensation for an anxiety condition linked to workplace interactions with managers. Two prior files involved similar anxiety and stress allegations, but OWCP had not combined them with the current claim. The Board set aside the decision and ordered OWCP to combine all three files before deciding again.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.
  • Outcome: Anxiety claim decision set aside and remanded.
  • Key point: OWCP needed the related claim files for a full review.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
K.F., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 23-1138
)
Issued: February 13, 2024
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
)
CHARLIE NORWOOD VA MEDICAL
)
CENTER, Augusta, GA Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER REMANDING CASE

Before:
PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge
VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On September 4, 2023 appellant filed a timely appeal from a July 12, 2023 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned the appeal Docket No. 23-1138.

On May 6, 2023 appellant, then a 50-year-old secretary, filed an occupational disease claim (Form CA-2) alleging that on April 4, 2023 she had an anxiety attack due factors of her federal employment. She related that she became distressed when a supervisor ordered her to go home as the employing establishment could not have her at work. Appellant noted that she began trembling uncontrollably, left the employing establishment, became disoriented, and walked to the emergency room. She noted that she first became aware of her condition and realized its relation to her federal employment on April 4, 2023. OWCP assigned the claim OWCP File No. xxxxxx165.1

1
Appellant filed a separate Form CA-2 on July 25, 2022, alleging that factors of her federal employment, including harassment, abuse, and discrimination by a supervisor, exacerbated her previously diagnosed stress condition. She indicated that she first became aware of her condition and its relationship to her employment on June 6, 2022. OWCP assigned that claim OWCP File No. xxxxxx753. Appellant had also previously filed a Form CA-2 on July 25, 2022 alleging that factors of her federal employment, including harassment and discrimination by her supervisor, caused an exacerbation of stress, panic attacks, and anxiety commencing July 22, 2022. OWCP assigned the claim OWCP File No. xxxxxx800. By decision dated July 12, 2023, OWCP denied the May 6, 2023 emotional condition claim under the current file, OWCP File No. xxxxxx165, finding that there were no compensable factors of employment and that appellant had not established a diagnosed medical condition in connection with the accepted employment events.

The Board has duly considered this matter and finds that the case is not in posture for decision.

OWCP’s procedures provide that cases should be administratively combined when correct adjudication depends on cross-referencing between files and where two or more injuries occur to the same part of the body. 2 For example, if a new injury case is reported for an employee who previously filed an injury claim for a similar condition or the same part of the body, doubling is required.3 In the instant case, OWCP File No. xxxxxx165, appellant filed an occupational disease claim for employment-related anxiety arising from interactions with managers. The Board notes that her prior claims under OWCP File Nos. xxxxxx800 and xxxxxx753 also involved claims for employment-related anxiety and stress precipitated by interactions with managers. However, appellant’s claims have not been administratively combined by OWCP.

For a full and fair adjudication, this case shall be remanded to OWCP to administratively combine the current case record, OWCP File No. xxxxxx165, with OWCP File Nos. xxxxxx800 and xxxxxx753. 4 Following this and other such further development as deemed necessary, OWCP shall issue a de novo decision.5

2
Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 2 -- Claims, File Maintenance and Management, Chapter 2.400.8c (February 2000).
3
Id.; Order Remanding Case, L.G., Docket No. 18-1676 (issued August 22, 2019); Order Remanding Case, D.L., Docket No. 17-1588 (issued January 28, 2019). 4 See Order Remanding Case, M.J., Docket No. 22-1357 (issued June 12, 2023); R.L., Docket No. 22-0603 (issued September 16, 2022); Order Remanding Case, S.R., Docket No. 21-0400 (issued April 25, 2022); Order Remanding Case, C.Y., Docket No. 20-1079 (issued December 7, 2020); Order Remanding Case, K.T., Docket No. 17-0432 (issued August 17, 2018). 5 See M.J., id.; R.L., id.; S.R., id.; Order Remanding Case, J.W., Docket Nos. 21-0588 & 21-0599 (issued January 21, 2022); Order Remanding Case, T.L., Docket No. 18-0935 (issued February 25, 2020); Order Remanding Case, T.M., Docket No. 18-0887 (issued February 21, 2019).

2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the April 6, 2023 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs is set aside and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order of the Board.

Issued: February 13, 2024
Washington, DC

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace