T.S. and U.S. Postal Service, Lake Worth Post Office (Board decision, December 27, 2023)

T.S. and U.S. Postal Service (ECAB 23-1127): one-day-late appeal dismissed

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
23-1127
Decided
December 27, 2023
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-10

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2023, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB final decision. The Board dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because it was filed after the 180-day deadline. The order does not decide the underlying compensation claim. Under 20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d), Board decisions and orders become final after 30 days. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days unless the order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a).

Plain-English summary

A Postal Service employee, through counsel, appealed a March 2, 2023 OWCP nonmerit decision on August 30, 2023. The 180-day deadline had expired the day before. The Board found no documented compelling circumstances for the delay and dismissed the appeal without reaching the compensation dispute. A later June 2, 2023 OWCP merits decision was outside this appeal because counsel did not appeal it.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: 20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e), the 180-day Board appeal deadline.
  • Outcome: Appeal from the March 2 decision dismissed as untimely.
  • Key point: The appeal arrived one day after the Board’s deadline.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
T.S., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 23-1127
)
Issued: December 27, 2023
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, LAKE WORTH POST )
OFFICE, Lake Worth, FL, Employer )
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Wayne Johnson, Esq., for the appellant1
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:
ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge
JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge
JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On August 30, 2023 appellant, through counsel, filed an appeal from a March 2, 2023 nonmerit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). 2 The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 23-1127.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act. 3 1 In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no claim for a fee for legal or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e). No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the Board. Id. An attorney or representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s approval may constitute a misdemeanor, subject to fine or imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also 18 U.S.C. § 292. Demands for payment of fees to a representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for investigation. 2 The case record also contains a June 2, 2023 merit decision of OWCP, denying appellant’s claim for compensation (Form CA-7) for intermittent disability during the period December 20, 2020 through December 6, 2021. As counsel did not appeal from this decision, the Board will not consider it in this appeal. See 20 C.F.R. § 501.3; see also T.L., Docket No. 22-0881 (issued December 14, 2022); D.E., Docket No. 21-0531 (issued June 16, 2021). 3 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).

For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s review authority is limited to appeals that are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of OWCP’s decision.4

The 180 th day following the March 2, 2023 decision was August 29, 2023. As appellant did not file an appeal with the Board until August 30, 2023, more than 180 days after the March 2, 2023 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 23 -1127 is untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not explained his failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision of OWCP, appealed by counsel, 5 within 180 days of the filing of this appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed as No. 23-1127, must be dismissed. 6 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 23-1127 is dismissed.

Issued: December 27, 2023
Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

4
20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of a decision of the OWCP.
5
See supra note 2.
6
The Board’s decisions and orders are final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance. Id. at § 501.6(d).

2

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace