T.E. and Department of Veterans Affairs, John J. Pershing VA Medical Center (Board decision, December 21, 2023)

T.E. and Department of Veterans Affairs (ECAB 23-1062): appeal dismissed without adverse OWCP decision

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
23-1062
Decided
December 21, 2023
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-10

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2023, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB final decision. The Board dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction because OWCP’s May 23, 2023 acceptance of conditions was not an adverse decision. The Board did not decide the pending wage loss compensation request. Under 20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d), Board decisions and orders become final after 30 days. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days unless the order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a).

Plain-English summary

A VA medical center employee appealed OWCP’s May 23, 2023 decision accepting chronic sinusitis and allergic rhinitis. She also sought wage loss compensation, but OWCP had not yet decided that request. The Board explained that it can review final adverse OWCP decisions and the acceptance decision was favorable to her. It dismissed the appeal without deciding her wage loss compensation entitlement.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: 20 C.F.R. § 501.3(a), review of final adverse OWCP decisions.
  • Outcome: Appeal dismissed for lack of an adverse decision.
  • Key point: An accepted claim is not an adverse decision, and the wage loss request was still pending before OWCP.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
T.E., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 23-1062
)
Issued: December 21, 2023
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
)
JOHN J. PERSHING VA MEDICAL CENTER, )
Poplar Bluff, MO, Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Scotty White, for the appellant1
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:
JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge
VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On August 7, 2023 appellant sought an appeal from a purported May 23, 2023 final adverse decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). 2 The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned the appeal Docket No. 23-1062.

By decision dated May 23, 2023, OWCP accepted the claim for chronic sinusitis and allergic rhinitis.

1
In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no claim for a fee for legal or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e). No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the Board. Id. An attorney or representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s approval may constitute a misdemeanor, subject to fine or imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also 18 U.S.C. § 292. Demands for payment of fees to a representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for investigation. 2 On appeal, appellant, through her representative, argued that she is entitled to wage-loss compensation causally related to the accepted October 1, 2018 injuries. The record reflects that, on May 31, 2023, she filed a claim for compensation (Form CA-7) for leave buy back for the period October 1, 2018 through May 26, 2023. The Board notes that OWCP has not yet adjudicated appellant’s entitlement to wage-loss compensation during the claimed period.

The Board, having duly considered the matter, notes that the Board has jurisdiction to review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act. 3 This jurisdiction encompasses any final decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of the date appellant filed the appeal. 4

Although the May 23, 2023 decision is within 180 days of appellant’s August 7, 2023 appeal, it is not adverse to appellant, and, therefore, it is not subject to appeal. 5 As there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP over which the Board may properly exercise jurisdiction, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed as No. 23-1062, must be dismissed. 6 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 23-1062 is dismissed.

Issued: December 21, 2023
Washington, DC

Janice B. Askin, Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3
5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).
4
Id. at § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of a decision of OWCP.
5
Id. at § 501.3(a).
6
The Board’s decisions and orders are final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance. Id. at § 501.6(d).

2

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace