I.S. and Government Publishing Office (Board decision, November 27, 2023)

Publishing Office worker's injury claim returned for combined file review (ECAB 23-1012)

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
23-1012
Decided
November 27, 2023
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-11

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2023, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB remand decision. The Board set aside OWCP's July 14, 2023 denial and returned the injury claim for combination with related claim files and a new decision; entitlement remains unresolved. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a). FECA compensation decisions are generally not subject to court review under 5 U.S.C. § 8128(b).

Plain-English summary

A Government Publishing Office materials handler reported falling backward from a chair at work. OWCP accepted that the March 2021 incident occurred but denied her injury claim for lack of medical causation evidence. The Board found that she had earlier claims involving the same arm and shoulder area, yet OWCP had not combined those records with the current claim. It set aside the denial and directed OWCP to combine the files, review the full record, and issue a new decision.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Federal Employees' Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; FECA Procedure Manual, chapter 2.400.8c.
  • Outcome: Injury claim denial set aside and remanded to combine related claim files.
  • Key point: Related injury files must be reviewed together when their evidence bears on a new claim involving the same body area.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
I.S., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 23-1012
)
Issued: November 27, 2023
GOVERNMENT PUBLISHING OFFICE,
)
Washington, DC, Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER REMANDING CASE

Before:
ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge
JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge
VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On July 17, 2023 appellant filed a timely appeal from a July 14, 2023 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned the appeal Docket No. 23-1012.

On April 9, 2021 appellant, then a 79-year-old materials handler, filed a traumatic injury claim (Form CA-1) alleging that on March 18, 2021 she injured her right ribcage when her chair rolled back and she fell backwards onto the floor while in the performance of duty. 1 She did not stop work.

In support of her claim, appellant submitted medical evidence discussing treatment for right upper extremity conditions in connection to the alleged March 18, 2021 employment incident.

1
OWCP assigned the present claim OWCP File No. xxxxxx079. Appellant previously filed a March 24, 2003 occupational disease claim under OWCP File No. xxxxxx093, which was accepted for tenosynovitis of the left wrist, bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, and left trigger finger. Additionally, it accepted a March 26, 2014 occupational disease claim under OWCP File No. xxxxxx721 for tenosynovitis of the right hand and wrist. OWCP also accepted a September 19, 2017 traumatic injury claim for strain of muscle, fascia, and tendon of the right biceps, strain of muscles and tendons of the right rotator cuff, superior glenoid labrum lesion of the right shoulder, and complete rotator cuff tear or rupture of the right shoulder. Appellant’s claims have not been administratively combined by OWCP. By decision dated February 15, 2022, OWCP denied appellant’s traumatic injury claim, finding that the evidence of record was insufficient to establish that the March 18, 2021 employment incident occurred, as alleged. It concluded, therefore, that the requirements had not been met to establish an injury as defined by the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act (FECA).

On March 4, 2022 appellant requested a review of the written record by a representative of OWCP’s Branch of Hearings and Review. Following a preliminary review, by decision dated May 31, 2022, OWCP’s hearing representative set aside the February 15, 2022 decision and remanded the case for further factual development.

By de novo decision dated September 20, 2022, OWCP again denied appellant’s traumatic injury claim, finding that the evidence of record was insufficient to establish that the March 18, 2021 employment incident occurred, as alleged. It concluded, therefore, that the requirements had not been met to establish an injury as defined by FECA.

Appellant continued to submit medical evidence regarding various right upper extremity conditions.

On May 30, 2023 appellant requested reconsideration. By decision dated July 14, 2023, OWCP modified the September 20, 2022 decision, finding that the evidence of record was sufficient to establish that the March 18, 2021 employment incident occurred, as alleged. However, the claim remained denied as the evidence of record was insufficient to establish a diagnosed medical condition causally related to the accepted March 18, 2021 employment incident.

The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that this case is not in posture for decision.

OWCP’s procedures provide that cases should be administratively combined when correct adjudication of the issues depends on frequent cross-referencing between files. 2 For example, if a new injury case is reported for an employee who previously filed an injury claim for a similar condition or the same part of the body, doubling is required. 3 Herein, appellant filed a traumatic injury claim on April 9, 2021, assigned OWCP File No. xxxxxx079, for various conditions, including right upper extremity conditions, and is the claim presently before the Board. She previously filed three claims for right upper extremity conditions, assigned OWCP File Nos. xxxxxx093, xxxxxx721, and xxxxxx436.

For a full and fair adjudication, the Board will remand the case to OWCP to administratively combine the current case record, OWCP File No. xxxxxx 079, with OWCP File

2
Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 2 -- Claims, File Maintenance and Management, Chapter 2.400.8c (February 2000).
3
Id.; S.G., Docket No. 21-0396 (issued September 27, 2021); R.L., Docket No. 20-0901 (issued July 27, 2021); M.E., Docket No. 21-0094 (issued May 27, 2021); L.M., Docket No. 19-1490 (issued January 29, 2020); L.H., Docket No 18-1777 (issued July 2, 2019).

2
Nos. xxxxxx093, xxxxxx721, and xxxxxx436. Following this and such further development as OWCP deems necessary, it shall issue a de novo decision. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the July 14, 2023 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs is set aside and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order of the Board.

Issued: November 27, 2023
Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace