E.E. and Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Administration Medical Center, San Antonio, TX (Board decision, July 25, 2023)

Board dismisses late appeal of VA medical center injury decisions (ECAB 23-0945)

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
23-0945
Decided
July 25, 2023
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-11

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2023, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB final decision. The Board dismissed the appeal as untimely because it was filed more than 180 days after the latest OWCP decision, dated December 27, 2022, and no compelling circumstances excused the delay. Under 20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d), this order becomes final 30 days after issuance. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days unless this order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a).

Plain-English summary

A VA medical center employee appealed OWCP decisions dated July 27 and December 27, 2022. The appeal was filed on June 30, 2023, five days after the 180-day period measured from the later decision. The Board found no supporting documentation showing compelling circumstances for the late filing. It dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction without reviewing the underlying claim.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: FECA, 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c), 501.3(a), 501.3(e), and 501.6(d).
  • Outcome: Appeal dismissed as untimely for lack of jurisdiction.
  • Key point: The Board's 180-day filing deadline barred review of the 2022 OWCP decisions.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
E.E., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 23-0945
)
Issued: July 25, 2023
DEPARTMENT OF VETERAN AFFAIRS,
)
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION MEDICAL
)
CENTER, San Antonio, TX, Employer )
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Dr. Anthony Rogers, for the appellant1
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:
ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge
VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On June 30, 2023 appellant, through his representative, filed an appeal from July 27 and December 27, 2022 merit decisions of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 23-0945.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act. 2 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s review

1
In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no claim for a fee for legal or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e). No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the Board. Id. An attorney or representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s approval may constitute a misdemeanor, subject to fine or imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also 18 U.S.C. § 292. Demands for payment of fees to a representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for investigation. 2 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a). authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuanc e of OWCP’s decision.3

The 180 th day following the December 27, 2022 decision was June 25, 2023. As appellant did not file an appeal with the Board until June 30, 2023, more than 180 days after the December 27, 2022 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 23-0945 is untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not offered a reason to explain his failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to establish compelling circumstances. Because there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of the filing of the instant appeal, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed as No. 23-0945, must be dismissed. 4 Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 23-0945 dismissed.

Issued: July 25, 2023
Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3
20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of a decision of the OWCP.” 4
The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id. at § 501.6(d).

2

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace