A.T. and U.S. Postal Service, Post Office, Forest Park (Board decision, November 20, 2023)

Board returns postal clerk's shoulder award for review of prior claim file (ECAB 23-0821)

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
23-0821
Decided
November 20, 2023
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-11

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2023, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB remand decision. The Board set aside OWCP's additional schedule award decision and ordered it to combine the related claim files before issuing a new award decision; entitlement to an additional award remains unresolved. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a).

Plain-English summary

A postal clerk sought a schedule award for lasting impairment of her left shoulder. OWCP granted an additional one percent impairment after subtracting an earlier award for the same arm. The Board found that the earlier claim file had not been included in the record it received. It set aside the new award decision and directed OWCP to combine the files and decide the schedule award again.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Federal Employees' Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.
  • Outcome: Additional one percent schedule award decision set aside; claim files to be combined on remand.
  • Key point: The prior award file was needed to assess a new award for the same arm.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
A.T., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 23-0821
)
Issued: November 20, 2023
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE, )
Forest Park, IL, Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER REMANDING CASE

Before:
ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge
VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On May 16, 2023 appellant filed a timely appeal from a May 3, 2023 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned the appeal Docket No. 23-0821.

On February 21, 2020 appellant, then a 53-year-old clerk, filed an occupational disease claim (Form CA-2) alleging that she developed left shoulder and arm pain due to factors of her federal employment, including repetitively pushing and pulling mail and boxes.1 She noted that she first became aware of her claimed condition on January 13, 2020 and its relation to her federal employment on January 16, 2020. OWCP accepted the claim for left shoulder strain. Appellant underwent OWCP-authorized surgery on February 18, 2022 by Dr. Kevin C. Tu, a Board-certified orthopedic surgeon and sports medicine specialist, which included left shoulder manipulation under anesthesia and arthroscopic capsulotomy, subacromial decompression, and distal clavicle

1
OWCP assigned the present claim OWCP File No. xxxxxx635. Appellant has a previously accepted March 19, 2015 traumatic injury claim for impingement syndrome and sprain of the left shoulder under OWCP File No. xxxxxx043. On February 23, 2017 OWCP granted her a schedule award for 10 percent permanent impairment of the left upper extremity under OWCP File No. xxxxxx043. excision. OWCP paid appellant wage-loss compensation on the supplemental rolls from February 22 through June 10, 2022.

On July 29, 2022 appellant filed a claim for compensation (Form CA-7) for a schedule award. She submitted medical evidence in support of her claim.

By decision dated May 3, 2023, OWCP granted appellant a schedule award for an additional one percent permanent impairment of the left upper extremity (11 percent less the prior award for 10 percent permanent impairment of the left upper extremity).

The Board, having duly considered the matter, finds that this case is not in posture for decision. OWCP’s procedures provide that cases should be administratively combined when correct adjudication of the issues depends on frequent cross-referencing between files. 2 For example, if a new injury case is reported for an employee who previously filed an injury claim for a similar condition or the same part of the body, doubling is required. 3 In the present claim, OWCP specifically referenced evidence from an earlier claim, OWCP File No. xxxxxx043, including a schedule award granting permanent impairment of the left upper extremity, i.e., the same extremity for which a schedule award was granted in the present claim, assigned OWCP File No. xxxxxx635. However, the evidence pertaining to OWCP File No. xxxxxx043 is not part of the case record presented before the Board. For a full and fair adjudication, the case shall be remanded to OWCP to administratively combine the current case record with OWCP File No . xxxxxx043, so it can consider all relevant claim files and accompanying evidence in adjudicating appellant’s schedule award claim. Following this and other such further development as deemed necessary, OWCP shall issue a de novo decision regarding appellant’s schedule award claim. Accordingly,

2
Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 2 -- Claims, File Maintenance and Management, Chapter 2.400.8c (February 2000).
3
Id.; M.L., Docket No. 20-1176 (issued April 29, 2021); L.M., Docket No. 19-1490 (issued January 29, 2020); L.H., Docket No. 18-1777 (issued July 2, 2019).

2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the May 3, 2023 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs is set aside and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order of the Board.

Issued: November 20, 2023
Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace