F.T. and Department of Veterans Affairs, Newington VA Clinic, Newington, CT (Board decision, September 28, 2023)

Board denies continuation of pay for late COVID injury notice (ECAB 23-0752)

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
23-0752
Decided
September 28, 2023
Outcome
Affirmed
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-11

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2023, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB final decision. The Board affirmed OWCP’s March 20, 2023 denial of continuation of pay following a claimed workplace COVID exposure. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a). FECA compensation decisions are generally not subject to court review under 5 U.S.C. § 8128(b).

Plain-English summary

A VA police officer sought continuation of pay after a January 2023 workplace COVID exposure. He filed his traumatic injury notice in March, more than 30 days after the last exposure. The Board held that this timing did not meet the filing condition for continuation of pay. It affirmed OWCP’s denial.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: FECA continuation of pay filing requirement, 5 U.S.C. § 8118.
  • Outcome: Denial of continuation of pay affirmed.
  • Key point: The traumatic injury notice for continuation of pay must be filed within 30 days of injury.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
F.T., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 23-0752
) Issued: September 28, 2023
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
)
NEWINGTON, VA CLINIC, Newington, CT,
)
Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

DECISION AND ORDER

Before:
ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge
PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JURISDICTION

On May 2, 2023 appellant filed a timely appeal from a March 20, 2023 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). Pursuant to the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act1 (FECA) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the Board has jurisdiction over the merits of this case.

ISSUE

The issue is whether appellant has met his burden of proof to establish entitlement to continuation of pay (COP).

FACTUAL HISTORY

On March 6, 2023 appellant, then a 65-year-old police officer, filed a traumatic injury claim (Form CA-1) alleging that on January 6, 2023 he was exposed to COVID-19 in the

1
5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq. performance of duty. On the reverse side of the claim form, appellant’s supervisor acknowledged that appellant was injured in the performance of duty. Appellant stopped work on January 6, 2023 and returned on January 17, 2023.

Appellant submitted a medical note dated January 12, 2023 and signed by Karen Sauer, a registered nurse. The note indicated that he had tested positive for COVID-19.

In a letter dated March 13, 2023, the employing establishment controverted appellant’s claim, contending that the injury was not reported on an approved form within 30 days of the injury.

By decision dated March 20, 2023, OWCP denied appellant’s claim for COP, finding that he had not reported his injury on an OWCP-approved form within 30 days of his alleged January 6, 2023 employment injury. It advised him that this decision only concerned his entitlement to COP and did not affect his entitlement to other compensation benefits.

LEGAL PRECEDENT

Section 8118(a) of FECA authorizes COP, not to exceed 45 days, to an employee who has filed a claim for a period of wage loss due to a traumatic injury with his or her immediate superior on a form approved by the Secretary of Labor within the time specified in section 8122(a)(2) of this title.2 This latter section provides that written notice of injury shall be given within 30 days. 3 The context of section 8122 makes clear that this means within 30 days of the injury.4

OWCP’s regulations provide, in pertinent part that, to be eligible for COP, an employee must: (1) have a traumatic injury which is job related, and the cause of the disability and/or the cause of lost time is due to the need for medical examination and treatment; (2) file Form CA-1 within 30 days of the date of the injury; and (3) begin losing time from work due to the traumatic injury within 45 days of the injury. 5

FECA Bulletin No. 21-09 at subsection II.2, however, provides that, “The FECA program considers COVID-19 to be a traumatic injury since it is contracted during a single workday or shift (see 20 C.F.R. § 10.5(ee)), and considers the date of last exposure prior to the

2
Id. at § 8118(a).
3
Id. at § 8122(a)(2).
4
E.M., Docket No. 20-0837 (issued January 27, 2021); J.S., Docket No. 18-1086 (issued January 17, 2019); Robert M. Kimzey, 40 ECAB 762-64 (1989); Myra Lenburg, 36 ECAB 487, 489 (1985). 5 20 C.F.R. § 10.205(a)(1-3); see also T.S., Docket No. 19-1228 (issued December 9, 2019); J.M., Docket No. 09-1563 (issued February 26, 2010); Dodge Osborne, 44 ECAB 849 (1993); William E. Ostertag, 33 ECAB 1925 (1982).

2 medical evidence establishing the COVID-19 diagnosis as the Date of Injury since the precise time of transmission may not always be known due to the nature of the virus.”6

ANALYSIS

The Board finds that appellant has not met his burden of proof to establish entitlement to COP.

The record reflects that appellant filed written notice of his traumatic injury on a Form CA-1 on March 6, 2023 alleging that on January 6, 2023 he was exposed to COVID-19 in the performance of duty. He stopped work on January 6, 2023 and returned on January 17, 2023. As previously noted, FECA Bulletin No. 21-09 defines date of injury as the date of last exposure, which in this case was January 6, 2023.7 As appellant filed his Form CA-1 on March 6, 2023 more than 30 days after the January 6, 2023 date of injury, the Board finds that he has not met his burden of proof.

Appellant may submit new evidence or argument with a written request for reconsideration to OWCP within one year of this merit decision, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 8128(a) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 10.605 through 10.607.

CONCLUSION

The Board finds that appellant has not met his burden of proof to establish entitlement to COP.

6
FECA Bulletin No. 21-09.II.2 (issued April 29, 2021). On March 11, 2021 the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) was signed into law. Pub. L. No. 117–2. OWCP issued FECA Bulletin No. 21-09 to provide guidance regarding the processing of COVID-19 FECA claims as set forth in the ARPA. Previously, COVID-19 claims under FECA were processed under the guidelines provided by FECA Bulletin No. 20 -05 (issued March 31, 2020) and FECA Bulletin No. 21-01 (issued October 21, 2020). FECA Bulletin No. 21-09 supersedes FECA Bulletin Nos. 20-05 and 21-01. 7 Id.

3
ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the March 20, 2023 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs is affirmed.

Issued: September 28, 2023
Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

4

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace