T.W. and U.S. Postal Service, Processing & Distribution Center, Las Vegas, NV (Board decision, October 30, 2023)

Board dismisses unsigned postal worker appeal (ECAB 23-0722)

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
23-0722
Decided
October 30, 2023
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-11

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2023, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB final decision. The Board dismissed T.W.'s appeal because she did not sign the appeal form, as required by 20 C.F.R. § 501.3(c)(6), after the Clerk requested it twice. The Board did not decide the underlying OWCP claim. Under 20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d), Board decisions and orders become final after 30 days. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days unless this order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a).

Plain-English summary

A representative filed an appeal for postal worker T.W. from an OWCP decision, but T.W. had not signed the appeal form. The Clerk twice requested a signed form and gave time to provide it. Neither T.W. nor her representative submitted one. The Board held that there was no valid appeal and dismissed the case without considering the underlying compensation claim.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Appellant signature requirement, 20 C.F.R. § 501.3(c)(6).
  • Outcome: Appeal dismissed for lack of a signed appeal form.
  • Key point: The appellant must personally sign the notice of appeal for the Board to hear it.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
T.W., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 23-0722
)
Issued: October 30, 2023
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, PROCESSING & )
DISTRIBUTION CENTER, Las Vegas, NV, )
Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Eymi Leon, for the appellant1
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:
PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge
JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On April 20, 2023 Eymi Leon filed a timely appeal in this matter from a February 16, 2023 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned the appeal Docket No. 23-0722. Appellant did not sign the appeal.

By letter dated April 26, 2023, the Clerk of the Appellate Boards informed Ms. Leon that the Board required an appeal form signed by appellant. The letter requested that a signed appeal form be submitted to the Board within 30 days of the date of the letter. By letter dated June 8, 2023, the Clerk of the Appellate Boards informed appellant that the Board required that she sign the appeal form. The letter requested that her signed appeal form be submitted to the Board within 30 days of the date of the letter.

1
In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no claim for a fee for legal or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e). No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the Board. Id. An attorney or representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s approval may constitute a misdemeanor, subject to fine or imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also 18 U.S.C. § 292. Demands for payment of fees to a representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for investigation.
The Board notes that Section 501.3(c)(6) requires that an appellant must sign the notice of appeal.2 If appellant does not sign the notice of appeal, there is no valid appeal before the Board.

Neither appellant nor her representative filed an appeal form signed by appellant within the time allotted for submission of a proper appeal.

The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that, as appellant has not filed a properly signed appeal form in this case, there is no valid appeal before the Board. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal assigned Docket No. 23-0722 is dismissed.3

Issued: October 30, 2023
Washington, DC

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

2
20 C.F.R. § 501.3(c)(6).
3
The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id. at § 501.6(d).

2

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace