B.K. and Department of Veterans Affairs, St. Cloud VA Medical Center, St. Cloud, MN (Board decision, May 2, 2023)
Board dismisses late appeal despite relocation explanation (ECAB 23-0578)
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 2023, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
ECAB final decision. The Board dismissed B.K.’s appeal of OWCP’s March 29, 2022 decision because it was filed February 2, 2023, after the 180-day filing period. His representative’s explanation that he had relocated did not establish compelling circumstances. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless the order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a).
Plain-English summary
The Board calculated that the appeal deadline was September 25, 2022. The later filing fell outside its jurisdiction, and the relocation explanation did not justify an exception. The Board did not review the compensation merits.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: 20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e).
- Outcome: Appeal dismissed as untimely.
- Key point: Appeal dismissed as untimely.
Full text (ECAB public release)
United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
________
)
B.K., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 23-0578
) Issued: May 2, 2023
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
)
ST. CLOUD VA MEDICAL CENTER,
)
St. Cloud, MN, Employer
)
__________ )
Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Melford V. McCormick, for the appellant1
Office of Solicitor, for the Director
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Before:
PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge
On February 2, 2023 appellant, through his representative, filed an appeal from a March 29, 2022 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 23-0578.
The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.2 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s
1
In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no claim for a fee for legal or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e). No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the Board. Id. An attorney or representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s approval may constitute a misdemeanor, subject to fine or imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also 18 U.S.C. § 292. Demands for payment of fees to a representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for investigation. 2 5 U.S.C. § 8101, et seq.; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a). review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of OWCP’s decision.3
The 180 th day following the March 29, 2022 decision was September 25, 2022. As appellant did not file an appeal with the Board until February 2, 2023, more than 180 days after the March 29, 2022 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 23-0578 is untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant’s representative proffered that appellant’s appeal is untimely because he relocated. However, this explanation is insufficient to establish compelling circumstances as contemplated by section 501.3(e) of the Board’s Rules of Procedure.4 Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 23-0578 is dismissed.5
Issued: May 2, 2023
Washington, DC
Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
3
20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of a decision of the OWCP.” 4
20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e): “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of a decision of the OWCP. The Board maintains discretion to extend the time period for filing an appeal if an applicant demonstrates compelling circumstances. Compelling circumstances means circumstances beyond the Appellant’s control that prevent the timely filing of an appeal and does not include any delay caused by the failure of an individual to exercise due diligence in submitting a notice of appeal.” 5 The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.” Id. at § 501.6(d).
2
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace