E.H. and Department of Veterans Affairs, Alvin C. York VA Medical Center, Murfreesboro, TN (Board decision, August 16, 2023)

Board returns VA nurse's COVID continuation of pay claim for last-exposure review (ECAB 23-0453)

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
23-0453
Decided
August 16, 2023
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-11

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2023, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB remand decision. The Board set aside OWCP's August 24, 2022 denial of continuation of pay and remanded for a new decision under FECA Bulletin No. 21-09. Entitlement to continuation of pay remains unresolved; the separate written-record review issue was rendered moot. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a).

Plain-English summary

A nurse at a VA medical center filed a COVID-19 injury claim after a positive antigen test. OWCP denied continuation of pay because the injury form was submitted more than 30 days after the date it used for the injury. The Board found that OWCP had not applied its COVID guidance, which uses the last work exposure before medical evidence of diagnosis as the injury date. It set aside the pay denial and directed OWCP to issue a new decision under that rule. The Board did not decide her separate request for written-record review because the remand resolved the merit issue for now.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: FECA continuation of pay and notice provisions, 5 U.S.C. §§ 8118(a), 8122(a)(2); FECA Bulletin No. 21-09.
  • Outcome: Continuation of pay denial set aside and remanded; written-record review issue moot.
  • Key point: OWCP must use the COVID last-exposure rule when assessing the filing deadline.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
E.H., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 23-0453
)
Issued: August 16, 2023
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS,
)
ALVIN C. YORK VA MEDICAL CENTER, )
Murfreesboro, TN, Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER REMANDING CASE

Before:
ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge
PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On February 10, 2023 appellant filed a timely appeal from an August 24, 2022 merit decision and an October 24, 2022 nonmerit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 23 -0453 to the appeal.

On August 12, 2022 appellant, then a 67-year-old nurse, filed a traumatic injury claim (Form CA-1) alleging that she contracted COVID-19 on July 9, 2022 while in the performance of duty. On the reverse side of the claim form, T.M., an employing establishment supervisor, confirmed that appellant’s injury occurred while in the performance of duty. Appellant stopped work on July 11, 2022 and returned on July 20, 2022.

In support of her claim, appellant submitted an antigen test result dated July 11, 2022, which revealed that she tested positive for COVID-19.

By decision dated August 24, 2022, OWCP denied appellant’s claim for continuation of pay (COP), finding that she had not reported her injury on an OWCP-approved form within 30 days following the injury. It noted that the denial of COP did not affect her entitlement to compensation benefits. In an appeal request form dated September 22, 2022 and received by OWCP on October 3, 2022, appellant requested a review of the written record by a representative of OWCP’s Branch of Hearings and Review.

By decision dated October 24, 2022, OWCP denied appellant’s request for a review of the written record, finding that it was untimely filed. It further exercised its discretion and determined that the issue in the case could equally well be addressed by a request for reconsideration before OWCP, along with the submission of new evidence.

The Board, having duly considered this matter, finds that this case is not in posture for decision.

Section 8118(a) of FECA authorizes COP, not to exceed 45 days, to an employee who has filed a claim for a period of wage loss due to a traumatic injury with his or her immediate superior on a form approved by the Secretary of Labor within the time specified in section 8122(a)(2) of this title.1 This latter section provides that written notice of injury shall be given within 30 days. 2 The context of section 8122 makes clear that this means within 30 days of the injury. 3

OWCP’s regulations provide, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for COP, an employee must: (1) have a traumatic injury which is job related and the cause of the disability and/or the cause of lost time due to the need for medical examination and treatment; (2) file Form CA-1 within 30 days of the date of the injury; and (3) begin losing time from work due to the traumatic injury within 45 days of the injury. 4

FECA Bulletin No. 21-09 at subsection II.2, however, provides that, “The FECA program considers COVID-19 to be a traumatic injury since it is contracted during a single workday or shift (see 20 C.F.R. § 10.5(ee)), and considers the date of last exposure prior to the medical evidence establishing the COVID-19 diagnosis as the Date of Injury since the precise time of transmission may not always be known due to the nature of the virus.”5

In denying appellant’s claim for COP, OWCP failed to consider the date of last exposure as the date of injury in accordance with the guidance in FECA Bulletin No. 21 -09. This case will

1
5 U.S.C. § 8118(a).
2
Id. at § 8122(a)(2).
3
E.M., Docket No. 20-0837 (issued January 27, 2021); J.S., Docket No. 18-1086 (issued January 17, 2019); Robert M. Kimzey, 40 ECAB 762-64 (1989); Myra Lenburg, 36 ECAB 487, 489 (1985). 4 20 C.F.R. § 10.205(a)(1-3); see also T.S., Docket No. 19-1228 (issued December 9, 2019); J.M., Docket No.
09-1563 (issued February 26, 2010); Dodge Osborne, 44 ECAB 849 (1993); William E. Ostertag, 33 ECAB 1925 (1982). 5 FECA Bulletin No. 21-09.II.2 (issued April 29, 2021). On March 11, 2021 the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) of 2021 was signed into law. Pub. L. No. 117–2. OWCP issued FECA Bulletin No. 21-09 to provide guidance regarding the processing of COVID-19 FECA claims as set forth in the ARPA. Previously, COVID-19 claims under FECA were processed under the guidelines provided by FECA Bulletin No. 20 -05 (issued March 31, 2020) and FECA Bulletin No. 21-01 (issued October 21, 2020). FECA Bulletin No. 21-09 supersedes FECA Bulletin Nos. 20-05 and 21-01.

2 therefore be remanded for application of FECA Bulletin No. 21-09 with regard to appellant’s claim for COP.6 Following this and other such further development as deemed necessary, OWCP shall issue a de novo decision. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the August 24, 2022 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs is set aside and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order of the Board. 7

Issued: August 16, 2023
Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

6
See Order Remanding Case, L.J., Docket No. 22-1041 (issued December 30, 2022); see also Order Remanding Case, K.C., Docket No. 22-1066 (issued December 23, 2022). 7 In light of the Board’s disposition of the merit issue, the nonmerit issue is rendered moot.

3

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace