B.H. and Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Wilmington International Airport, Wilmington, NC (Board decision, August 10, 2023)

Board orders new review of air traffic controller's COVID-19 pay claim (ECAB 23-0355)

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
23-0355
Decided
August 10, 2023
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-11

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2023, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB remand decision. The Board set aside OWCP's January 4, 2023 denial of continuation of pay and remanded for application of its COVID-19 guidance and a new decision. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a). FECA compensation decisions are generally not subject to court review under 5 U.S.C. § 8128(b).

Plain-English summary

An FAA air traffic controller sought continuation of pay after testing positive for COVID-19 in October 2022. OWCP denied it because his injury form was filed more than 30 days after the reported injury date. The Board found that OWCP had not applied its COVID-19 guidance, which treats the last work exposure before diagnosis as the injury date. It set aside the denial and ordered a new decision under that guidance. Eligibility for continuation of pay remains unresolved.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: FECA continuation of pay, 5 U.S.C. §§ 8118(a), 8122(a)(2); 20 C.F.R. § 10.205(a).
  • Outcome: Denial set aside; case remanded for a new decision.
  • Key point: OWCP must apply its COVID-19 injury date guidance to a continuation of pay claim.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
B.H., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 23-0355
)
Issued: August 10, 2023
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
)
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, )
WILMINGTON INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, )
Wilmington, NC, Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER REMANDING CASE

Before:
JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge
VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

On January 12, 2023 appellant filed a timely appeal from a January 4, 2023 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 23-0355 to the appeal.

On December 15, 2022 appellant, then a 41-year-old air traffic controller, filed a traumatic injury claim (Form CA-1) alleging that on October 17, 2022 he contracted COVID-19 while in the performance of duty. On the reverse side of the claim form, the employing establishment controverted continuation of pay (COP) contending that it was filed more than 30 days after the date of injury. Appellant did not indicate on the claim form when he stopped work.

In support of his claim, appellant submitted an October 17, 2022 test result demonstrating that he tested positive for COVID-19 on that date.

By decision dated December 29, 2022, OWCP denied appellant’s claim for COP, finding that he had not reported his injury on an OWCP-approved form within 30 days of his alleged October 17, 2022 employment injury. It advised him that the COP denial did not affect his entitlement to other compensation benefits. On January 3, 2023 OWCP received an undated OWCP report of work status, which listed an October 17, 2022 date of injury and indicated that appellant stopped work on October 18, 2022 and returned to full-time regular duty without restrictions on October 25, 2022.

By decision dated January 4, 2023, OWCP denied appellant’s claim for COP, finding that he had not reported his injury on an OWCP-approved form within 30 days of the accepted employment injury. It advised him that the COP denial did not affect his entitlement to other compensation benefits.

The Board, having duly considered the matter, finds that this case is not in posture for decision.

Section 8118(a) of FECA authorizes COP, not to exceed 45 days, to an employee who has filed a claim for a period of wage loss due to a traumatic injury with his or her immediate superior on a form approved by the Secretary of Labor within the time specified in section 8122(a)(2) of this title.1 This latter section provides that written notice of injury shall be given within 30 days. 2 The context of section 8122 makes clear that this means within 30 days of the injury. 3

OWCP’s regulations provide, in pertinent part, that, to be eligible for COP, an employee must: (1) have a traumatic injury which is job related and the cause of the disability and/or the cause of lost time due to the need for medical examination and treatment; (2) file a Form CA-1 within 30 days of the date of the injury; and (3) begin losing time from work due to the traumatic injury within 45 days of the injury. 4

FECA Bulletin No. 21-09 at subsection II.2., however, provides, “The FECA program considers COVID-19 to be a traumatic injury since it is contracted during a single workday or shift (see 20 C.F.R. § 10.5(ee)), and considers the date of last exposure prior to the medical evidence establishing the COVID-19 diagnosis as the Date of Injury since the precise time of transmission may not always be known due to the nature of the virus.”5

In denying appellant’s claim for COP, OWCP failed to consider the date of last exposure as the date of injury in accordance with the guidance in FECA Bulletin No. 21-09. This case will,

1
5 U.S.C. § 8118(a).
2
Id. at § 8122(a)(2).
3
E.M., Docket No. 20-0837 (issued January 27, 2021); J.S., Docket No. 18-1086 (issued January 17, 2019); Robert M. Kimzey, 40 ECAB 762-64 (1989); Myra Lenburg, 36 ECAB 487, 489 (1985). 4 20 C.F.R. § 10.205(a)(1-3); see also T.S., Docket No. 19-1228 (issued December 9, 2019); J.M., Docket No.
09-1563 (issued February 26, 2010); Dodge Osborne, 44 ECAB 849 (1993); William E. Ostertag, 33 ECAB 1925 (1982). 5 FECA Bulletin No. 21-09.II.2 (issued April 29, 2021). On March 11, 2021 the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) of 2021 was signed into law. Pub. L. No. 117-2. OWCP issued FECA Bulletin No. 21-09 to provide guidance regarding the processing of COVID-19 FECA claims as set forth in the ARPA. Previously, COVID-19 claims under FECA were processed under the guidelines provided by FECA Bulletin No. 20-05 (issued March 31, 2020) and FECA Bulletin No. 21-01 (issued October 21, 2020). FECA Bulletin No. 21-09 supersedes FECA Bulletin Nos. 20-05 and 21-01.

2 therefore, be remanded for application of FECA Bulletin No. 21 -09 with regard to appellant’s claim for COP. 6 Following this and other such further development as deemed necessary, OWCP shall issue a de novo decision. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the January 4, 2023 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs is set aside and the case is remanded for further proceeding consistent with this order of the Board.

Issued: August 10, 2023
Washington, DC

Janice B. Askin, Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

6
See Order Remanding Case, B.B., Docket No. 23-0124 (issued January 25, 2023); Order Remanding Case, J.S., Docket No. 22-0854 (issued December 5, 2022); Order Remanding Case, A.E., Docket No. 22-0633 (issued October 14, 2022).

3

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace