A.N. and Department of State, Bureau of Consular Services, Minneapolis, MN (Board decision, June 15, 2023)

Board denies continuation of pay for late COVID-19 injury notice (ECAB 23-0291)

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
23-0291
Decided
June 15, 2023
Outcome
Affirmed
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-11

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2023, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB final decision. The Board affirmed OWCP's November 15, 2022 denial of continuation of pay because the employee did not file the required injury form within 30 days. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a). FECA compensation decisions are generally not subject to court review under 5 U.S.C. § 8128(b).

Plain-English summary

A State Department passport and visa clerk reported contracting COVID-19 while working with the public. She identified July 3, 2022 as the injury date but filed her injury form on November 10, 2022. The Board held that the filing came after the 30-day notice period for continuation of pay. It affirmed OWCP's denial of that wage continuation benefit. The decision says this denial does not determine her entitlement to other compensation benefits.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Continuation of pay and injury notice rules, 5 U.S.C. §§ 8118(a), 8122(a)(2); 20 C.F.R. § 10.205(a).
  • Outcome: Denial of continuation of pay affirmed.
  • Key point: A COVID-19 injury claim must meet the 30-day injury form deadline to qualify for continuation of pay.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
A.N., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 23-0291
)
Issued: June 15, 2023
DEPARTMENT OF STATE, BUREAU OF
)
CONSULAR SERVICES, Minneapolis, MN, )
Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

DECISION AND ORDER

Before:
JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge
VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge

JURISDICTION

On December 27, 2022 appellant filed a timely appeal from a November 15, 2022 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). Pursuant to the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act1 (FECA) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the Board has jurisdiction over the merits of this case.2

1
5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.
2
The Board notes that, following the November 15, 2022 decision, OWCP received additional evidence. However, the Board’s Rules of Procedure provides: “The Board’s review of a case is limited to the evidence in the case record that was before OWCP at the time of its final decision. Evidence not before OWCP will not be considered by the Board for the first time on appeal.” 20 C.F.R. § 501.2(c)(1). Thus, the Board is precluded from reviewing this additional evidence for the first time on appeal. Id.
ISSUE

The issue is whether appellant has met her burden of proof to establish entitlement to continuation of pay (COP).

FACTUAL HISTORY

On November 10, 2022 appellant, then a 43-year-old passport and visa examining clerk, filed a traumatic injury (Form CA-1) alleging that on July 3, 2022 she contracted COVID-19 as a result of working with the public while in the performance of duty. She stopped work on July 3, 2002 and returned to work on August 15, 2022. On the reverse side of the claim form, appellant’s supervisor acknowledged that appellant was injured in the performance of duty.

OWCP received laboratory results dated July 3, 2022, which indicated that appellant tested positive for COVID-19.

By decision dated November 15, 2022, OWCP denied appellant’s claim for COP, finding that she had not reported her July 3, 2022 injury on an OWCP-approved form within 30 days of the date of injury. It further noted that the decision concerned her entitlement to COP and that it did not affect her entitlement to other compensation benefits.

LEGAL PRECEDENT

Section 8118(a) of FECA authorizes COP, not to exceed 45 days, to an employee who has filed a claim for a period of wage loss due to a traumatic injury with his o r her immediate superior on a form approved by the Secretary of Labor within the time specified in section 8122(a)(2) of FECA.3 This latter section provides that written notice of injury shall be given within 30 days.4 The context of section 8122 makes clear that this means within 30 days of the injury. 5

OWCP’s regulations provide, in pertinent part, that, to be eligible for COP, an employee must: (1) have a traumatic injury which is job related and the cause of the disability and/or the cause of lost time due to the need for medical examination and treatment; (2) file Form CA-1 within 30 days of the date of the injury; and (3) begin losing time from work due to the traumatic injury within 45 days of the injury.6

FECA Bulletin No. 21-09 at subsection II.2, however, provides that, “The FECA program considers COVID-19 to be a traumatic injury since it is contracted during a single workday or shift

3
Supra note 1 at § 8118(a).
4
Id. at § 8122(a)(2).
5
K.P., Docket No. 22-1184 (issued December 28, 2022); E.M., Docket No. 20-0837 (issued January 27, 2021);
J.S., Docket No. 18-1086 (issued January 17, 2019); Robert M. Kimzey, 40 ECAB 762-64 (1989); Myra Lenburg, 36 ECAB 487, 489 (1985). 6 20 C.F.R. § 10.205(a)(1-3); see also K.P., id.; T.S., Docket No. 19-1228 (issued December 9, 2019); J.M., Docket No. 09-1563 (issued February 26, 2010); Dodge Osborne, 44 ECAB 849 (1993); William E. Ostertag, 33 ECAB 1925(1982).

2
(see 20 C.F.R. § 10.5(ee)), and considers the date of last exposure prior to the medical evidence establishing the COVID-19 diagnosis as the Date of Injury since the precise time of transmission may not always be known due to the nature of the virus.”7

ANALYSIS

The Board finds that appellant has not met her burden of proof to establish entitlement to COP.

The record reflects that appellant filed a Form CA-1 on November 10, 2022. As previously noted, FECA Bulletin No. 21-09 defines date of injury as the date of last exposure, which in this case was July 3, 2022.8 By decision dated November 15, 2022, OWCP denied appellant’s request for COP, as her claim was not filed within 30 days of the claimed July 3, 2022 employment injury. As appellant filed written notice of her traumatic injury claim on November 15, 2022 more than 30 days after the claimed July 3, 2022 employment injury, the Board finds that she has not met her burden of proof to establish entitlement to COP.

Appellant may submit new evidence or argument with a written request for reconsideration to OWCP within one year of this merit decision, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 8128(a) and 20 C.F.R.
§§ 10.605 through 10.607.

CONCLUSION

The Board finds that appellant has not met her burden of proof to establish entitlement to COP.

7
FECA Bulletin No. 21-09.II.2 (issued April 29, 2021). On March 11, 2021 the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 (ARPA) was signed into law. Pub. L. No. 117 2. OWCP issued FECA Bulletin No. 21-09 to provide guidance regarding the processing of COVID-19 FECA claims as set forth in the ARPA. Previously, COVID-19 claims under FECA were processed under the guidelines provided by FECA Bulletin No. 20-05 (issued March 31, 2020) and FECA Bulletin No. 21-01 (issued October 21, 2020). FECA Bulletin No. 21-09 supersedes FECA Bulletin Nos. 20-05 and 21-01. 8 Id.

3
ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the November 15, 2022 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs is affirmed.

Issued: June 15, 2023
Washington, DC

Janice B. Askin, Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

4

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace