M.V. and Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Flushing, NY (Board decision, September 30, 2022)
Board returns air traffic controller's COVID-19 pay claim (ECAB 22-0515)
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 2022, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
ECAB remand decision. The Board set aside OWCP's February 7, 2022 denial and remanded for a new continuation-of-pay decision; eligibility remains unresolved. Under 20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d), this order becomes final 30 days after issuance. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days unless this order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a).
Plain-English summary
An air traffic controller reported close contact with a coworker who had COVID-19 and later tested positive. OWCP denied continuation of pay because he filed his injury claim more than 30 days after the December 23, 2021 contact date. The Board found that OWCP had not applied FECA Bulletin No. 21-09, which uses the worker's last exposure before medical evidence of a COVID-19 diagnosis as the injury date. It set aside the denial and returned the claim for OWCP to apply that guidance and issue a new decision. The Board did not decide whether he qualifies for continuation of pay.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: Continuation of pay and injury notice, 5 U.S.C. §§ 8118(a), 8122(a)(2); 20 C.F.R. § 10.205(a); FECA Bulletin No. 21-09.
- Outcome: February 7, 2022 denial set aside; claim remanded for a new decision.
- Key point: OWCP had to apply the COVID-19 injury-date guidance before deciding whether the claim was timely.
Full text (ECAB public release)
United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
________
)
M.V., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 22-0515
) Issued: September 30, 2022
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION,
)
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION,
)
Flushing, NY, Employer
)
__________ )
Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director
ORDER REMANDING CASE
Before:
ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge
PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge JAMES D. McGINLEY, Alternate Judge
On February 18, 2022 appellant filed a timely appeal from a February 7, 2022 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 22-0515.
On January 25, 2022 appellant, then a 44-year-old air traffic controller, filed a traumatic injury claim (Form CA-1) alleging that on December 23, 2021 he had close contact with a COVID- 19 positive coworker while in the performance of duty. He advised that he then tested positive for COVID-19. On the reverse side of the claim form, the employing establishment indicated that appellant had stopped work at 8:00 a.m. on December 25, 2021 and that his duty hours were 8:35 a.m. until 4:35 p.m.
A polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test performed on January 21, 2022 was positive for COVID-19.
On February 4, 2022 the employing establishment controverted appellant’s request for COP as he had not filed his claim within 30 days of the date of injury.
By decision dated February 7, 2022, OWCP found that appellant was not entitled to COP as he had not reported his injury on an OWCP-approved form within 30 days of the date of injury, December 23, 2021.
The Board, having duly considered this matter, finds that this case is not in posture for decision.
Section 8118(a) of FECA authorizes COP, not to exceed 45 days, to an employee who has filed a claim for a period of wage loss due to a traumatic injury with his or her immediate superior on a form approved by the Secretary of Labor within the time specified in section 8122(a)(2) of this title.1 This latter section provides that written notice of injury shall be given within 30 days. 2 The context of section 8122 makes clear that this means within 30 days of the injury. 3
OWCP’s regulations provide, in pertinent part, that to be eligible for COP, an employee must: (1) have a traumatic injury which is job related and the cause of the disability and/or the cause of lost time due to the need for medical examination and treatment; (2) file Form CA-1 within 30 days of the date of the injury; and (3) begin losing time from work due to the traumatic injury within 45 days of the injury. 4
FECA Bulletin No. 21-09 at subsection II.2., however, provides that, “The FECA program considers COVID-19 to be a traumatic injury since it is contracted during a single workday or shift (see 20 C.F.R. § 10.5(ee)), and considers the date of last exposure prior to the medical evidence establishing the COVID-19 diagnosis as the date of injury since the precise time of transmission may not always be known due to the nature of the virus.”5
In denying appellant’s claim for COP, OWCP failed to consider the date of last exposure as the date of injury in accordance with the guidance in FECA Bulletin No. 21 -09. This case will therefore be remanded for application of FECA Bulletin No. 21-09 with regard to appellant’s claim for COP.6 Following this and other such further development as deemed necessary, OWCP shall issue a de novo decision. Accordingly,
1
Id. at § 8118(a).
2
Id. at § 8122(a)(2).
3
E.M., Docket No. 20-0837 (issued January 27, 2021); J.S., Docket No. 18-1086 (issued January 17, 2019); Robert M. Kimzey, 40 ECAB 762-64 (1989); Myra Lenburg, 36 ECAB 487, 489 (1985). 4 20 C.F.R. § 10.205(a)(1-3); see also T.S., Docket No. 19-1228 (issued December 9, 2019); J.M., Docket No. 09- 1563 (issued February 26, 2010); Dodge Osborne, 44 ECAB 849 (1993).; William E. Ostertag, 33 ECAB 1925(1982). 5 FECA Bulletin No. 21-09.II.2 (issued April 29, 2021). On March 11, 2021 the American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) of 2021 was signed into law. Pub. L. No. 117–2. OWCP issued FECA Bulletin No. 21-09 to provide guidance regarding the processing of COVID-19 FECA claims as set forth in the ARPA. Previously, COVID-19 claims under FECA were processed under the guidelines provided by FECA Bulletin No. 20 -05 (released March 31, 2020) and FECA Bulletin No. 21-01 (released October 21, 2020). FECA Bulletin No. 21-09 supersedes FECA Bulletin Nos. 20-05 and 21-01. 6 See e.g., Order Remanding Case, W.G., Docket No. 18-0451 (issued February 21, 2019) (The Board found that OWCP failed to properly develop the medical evidence by requesting the DMA to provide an impairment rating in accordance with the new guidance in FECA Bulletin No. 17-06 for consistently rating upper extremity impairments. The Board remanded the case for further development consistent with OWCP procedures in FECA Bulletin No. 17 - 06); Order Remanding Case, H.W., Docket No. 10-404 (issued September 28, 2011) (The Board remanded the case to OWCP for selection of another impartial medical specialist in accordance with its procedures).
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT February 7, 2022 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs is set aside and the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this order of the Board.
Issued: September 30, 2022
Washington, DC
Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
James D. McGinley, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
3
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace